From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Palestinians Killed Muhammed Al-Dura
Palis killed the kid, say German news people
Gaza City/Hamburg - Nearly 18 months after television footage was aired of the killing of 12-year-old Mohammed A-Dura near the Netzarim junction
in the Gaza Strip, a dispute has erupted over who shot him.
A-Dura was killed during an exchange of fire between IDF soldiers and Palestinian gunmen at the junction, and the event has become a potent symbol of the Palestinian uprising.
A report broadcast Monday by German ARD television said A-Dura was shot dead by Palestinian militants during the shootout with the soldiers.
ARD said its report by Esther Shapira included photographs and documents proving that contrary to earlier reports the boy had not been shot dead by Israeli soldiers but by Palestinian militants.
Virtually all Israeli media had assumed at the time that Mohammed,
was shot dead by soldiers during the 30-minute clash.
The father of Mohammed A-Dura, Jamal, who was seriously injured in the shootout, rejected the report: "I am 100 percent certain that the Israelis were to blame," he said. "I have medical reports, X-rays and reports by eyewitnesses confirming that we came under fire from Israeli soldiers."
The Palestinian cameraman, Talal Abu Rachman, who filmed the death
of Mohammed on September 30, 2000, declined to comment on the ARD
report, saying he had to watch the program first.
Abu Rachman had said in his initial testimony that no Palestinian
gunmen had fired shots at the time when the boy was killed.
The former GOC Southern Command, Yom-Tov Samia, who headed an investigation into the shooting of A-Dura, told Israel Radio on Tuesday that the army had erred in hurrying to apologize for the boy's death. Senior IDF officers who issued the apology, said Samia, "made a very grave mistake."
"One day," he added, "it will be proven that the whole story... was one big Palestinian production. And Palestinian propoganda has been riding on this for a long time now."
in the Gaza Strip, a dispute has erupted over who shot him.
A-Dura was killed during an exchange of fire between IDF soldiers and Palestinian gunmen at the junction, and the event has become a potent symbol of the Palestinian uprising.
A report broadcast Monday by German ARD television said A-Dura was shot dead by Palestinian militants during the shootout with the soldiers.
ARD said its report by Esther Shapira included photographs and documents proving that contrary to earlier reports the boy had not been shot dead by Israeli soldiers but by Palestinian militants.
Virtually all Israeli media had assumed at the time that Mohammed,
was shot dead by soldiers during the 30-minute clash.
The father of Mohammed A-Dura, Jamal, who was seriously injured in the shootout, rejected the report: "I am 100 percent certain that the Israelis were to blame," he said. "I have medical reports, X-rays and reports by eyewitnesses confirming that we came under fire from Israeli soldiers."
The Palestinian cameraman, Talal Abu Rachman, who filmed the death
of Mohammed on September 30, 2000, declined to comment on the ARD
report, saying he had to watch the program first.
Abu Rachman had said in his initial testimony that no Palestinian
gunmen had fired shots at the time when the boy was killed.
The former GOC Southern Command, Yom-Tov Samia, who headed an investigation into the shooting of A-Dura, told Israel Radio on Tuesday that the army had erred in hurrying to apologize for the boy's death. Senior IDF officers who issued the apology, said Samia, "made a very grave mistake."
"One day," he added, "it will be proven that the whole story... was one big Palestinian production. And Palestinian propoganda has been riding on this for a long time now."
For more information:
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
http://www.gamla.org.il/english/feature/lynch2a.htm
or download the movies:
http://www.gamla.org.il/mishpat1.mpg
http://www.gamla.org.il/mishpat2.mpg
First, the raw footage, that was shot by the photographer, Talal Abu Rachman, was asked for by Israel, as well as by other, more neutral bodies. The network (France 2) has consistently refused. By acting so it encouraged a comprehensive,independent inquiry, which was published,with a cold, rational analysis of the occurrences. It was based on testimonies, photographs and experts' understandings of the battle. I looked for the Palestinian report but couldn't find any. I could only find know-all statements.
Second, since it was used by some partisans, it is very legitimate to try and verify the facts. Usually, people that are unwilling to be disturbed by the facts may be considered as trying to avoid the truth. Do you not think the father would like to know who killed his son? What makes you think he would rather not hearing the facts, assuming they are slightly different then those you think he should remember?