top
Palestine
Palestine
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Media Caught in a Lie About a Quote that was Never Made

by Nigel Parry
Even though the Washington Times could not back up its quote with any evidence whatsoever, they refused to retract it and the Canadian government bought it hook, line and sinker and made it illegal to give aid to an organization which is basically a relief agency to the region's poor. All the while, Israel enjoys ever more and more aid without ANY scrutiny except in marginal media which is bitterly condemned by Israel's supporters.
False Washington Times report convinces Canada to ban Hizbullah
Nigel Parry, The Electronic Intifada, 13 December 2002

washtimeshizb.jpg"
Washington Times assertions helped change Canada's policy towards an organisation that is widely recognised for its humanitarian contributions in desperate areas of the Middle East. That the reports later turned out to be false apparently doesn't seem to matter.
On Wednesday 11th December 2002, the social arm of Lebanese resistance group Hizbullah was one of three organisations to be added to Canada's official list of "terrorist entities".

Hizbullah's military wing has been banned in Canada since 2001 but up until Wednesday, it was still legal to contribute to the social arm of the organisation.

"This decision is made on the basis of sound criminal and security intelligence information and in no way is due to political pressure from anywhere," insisted Wayne Easter, Canada's Solicitor General.

Easter felt compelled to put it this way for the very reason that adding Hizbullah to lists of "terrorist" organisations has long been a noisy and overt goal of pro-Israeli groups in North America.

Indeed, pro-Israeli organization B'nai Brith Canada had launched an action last week in the Federal Court of Canada in a bid to force the government to declare Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

Prior to the ban, Canada's official position has long been that the social/political wing of Hizbullah was doing good, charitable works in the Middle East. Few dispute the beneficial nature of the massive network of medical, educational, and charitable services provided by Hizbullah in some very desperate areas with no other sources of social support.

Indeed just ten days earlier, on 1 December 2002, Easter commented to CTV News in an interview on CTV's Question Period that "If I came forward with listings just basing it on headlines and not doing the proper research, you people would be asking me 'What about civil liberties, what about due process?' and you'd be right to do that." ("Cdn Jewish, Arab groups at odds over Hezbollah", ctv.ca, 2 December 2002)

So what "sound criminal and security intelligence information" surfaced and what process took place in the ten days between December 1st and December 11th?

None did. Apparently a single, initial media report on December 4th was sufficient.

Many Canadian newspapers and politicians -- and indeed international media organisations including Reuters and the Associated Press -- have widely cited the ultimate deciding factor for Canada's policy change towards Hizbullah to be statements by its leader Hassan Nasrallah last month in which he allegedly urged Palestinians to undertake additional suicide bombings in and outside of Israel/Palestine, in locations around the world.
Canada puts total ban on Hezbollah
Reuters, 12 December 2002.

OTTAWA - Canada slapped a total ban on Hezbollah yesterday after the group urged Palestinians to carry out more suicide attacks in Israel.

Hezbollah's military wing was banned by Canada in late 2001. However, for several months, Ottawa resisted pressure to outlaw the group's political wing, which Foreign Minister Bill Graham described as a legitimate political and social movement.

But the government changed its mind after Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah was quoted as urging Palestinians to ignore international criticism of suicide attacks and keep up their armed struggle against Israel.

The decision means Canada has taken a harder line on Hezbollah than allies such as Britain, which banned the movement's military wing 18 months ago but still recognizes the political wing.

Ottawa has been under increasing pressure from Jewish groups and the official opposition Canadian Alliance party to ban Hezbollah outright. Last month, the B'nai B'rith organization launched a lawsuit against Ottawa on the issue.

Under the ban, Hezbollah's assets can be seized, and any person who handles the finances or the property of the group faces a sentence of up to 10 years in jail.
It has become accepted wisdom that Nasrallah allegedly made some sort of call for more suicide bombings not only inside Israel, as Reuters describes above, but also internationally.

An Associated Press report of December 11th noted that, "Recent statements attributed to a Hezbollah leader called for expanding terrorist attacks outside the Middle East. That convinced Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham to ban the entire organization." ("Canada Adds Hezbollah to Banned Groups", Tom Cohen, Associated Press Writer, 11 December 2002).

The effect of the initial reports was dramatic. "The [government's] defence completely fell apart last week," declared Bill Rogers in the Ottawa Sun, "when the leader of Hezbollah, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, encouraged Palestinians in a speech in Lebanon 'to take suicide bombings worldwide.'" ("Canada takes aim at Hezbollah", 12 December 2002).

Keith Landry president of the Canadian Jewish Congress was quoted as saying that "Nasrallah confirmed what we, and others, have been telling the government all along, Hezbollah is one of the most dangerous international terrorist networks in the world. Their fundraising, recruitment and operations - including a significant Canadian-based component - have a long global reach." ("Social wing of Hezbollah raised money for terrorism, says Solicitor General", Canadian Press, 11 December 2002)

In the same article, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham expressed the government's understanding as now being that Hizbullah "still does (humanitarian) works, it still does hospitals, it does things but it was clear from the leader's comments the other day that, in fact, it was not distinguishing itself from terrorist activities."

However, an excellent Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) report by CBC journalist Neil Macdonald, has uncovered the surprising reality that the alleged remarks were not made by Hizbullah leader Nasrallah at all. Here is a transcript from the 11 December 2002 CBC broadcast:
PETER MANSBRIDGE: Well now to that crucial quote, the one that helped kickstart the change in Canadian policy and attributed to Hezbollah's Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah. The CBC's Middle East correspondent Neil MacDonald went to Beirut to investigate what was said and what was not. Here's his revealing report.

NEIL MACDONALD (Reporter): This unremarkable cleric enjoys legendary status in the Arab world. The man whose fighters drove Israel out of Lebanon. Israel and its supporters, though, regard Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah of Hezbollah as a cold-blooded terrorist and say his own words have now provided the proof. Certainly the quotes attributed to him last week and reported widely in most Canadian media were ominous. "Suicide bombings should be exported outside Palestine", he was reported to have said. "I encourage Palestinians to take suicide bombings worldwide, don't be shy about it." Canadian Jewish groups and their allies immediately pressed their demand that Canada classify Hezbollah as a terrorist group. Ottawa resisted doing that, given that Hezbollah also runs a social network with projects like this one which retrains and offers work to disabled Lebanese. Hassan Nasrallah's heavily reported new quotes merely had an impact. The only problem is there is simply no evidence Hassan Nasrallah ever made a speech promoting global suicide attacks. There is no record of such a speech here, and there would be. It was not broadcast on Hezbollah's television station, as was reported. Hezbollah, which vigorously publicizes Nasrallah's every word, says the remarks were never uttered and the Canadian embassy in Beirut has tried and failed to document the quotes. The story originated not in the Middle East but in London, with this man. Paul Martin freelances for "The Washington Times," a right wing newspaper owned by the Unification Church. He cannot back up the quotes his story attributes to Nasrallah. Nevertheless, he believes he understands Nasrallah's true agenda.

PAUL MARTIN (The Washington Times): Nasrallah said we look at America as the enemy of this nation. He then adds, we will fight the enemy or them anywhere and everywhere and says that we need to work on the culture of suicide missions.

MACDONALD: There is nothing new in Nasrallah's support for Palestinian tactics in the occupied territories and in Israel. Just recently, Nasrallah praised Palestinians he says are, quote, "willing to sacrifice themselves fighting Israel with whatever weapon", suicide bombs included. But, says Hezbollah legislator Mohammed Raad, Nasrallah has specifically instructed that Hezbollah's fight with Israel is military in nature and not to be taken outside the region. Raad says "The Washington Times" story about exporting attacks as part of a propaganda orchestrated by America's pro-Israel right wing. Indeed, there does seem to be a theme to "Washington Times" stories. Earlier this year, the paper ran a report by a reporter named Sayed Anwar accusing Palestinian Muslims of raping, executing and extorting Christians in Bethlehem. When the story was questioned, Sayed Anwar turned out to be a fictitious name. A composite for Paul Martin and two of his researchers. Martin refused to discuss that incident on camera. Ottawa now knows that the Nasrallah quotes in the "Washington Times" about exporting suicide attacks were almost certainly never uttered. Of course what this all really boils down to is the old question of what constitutes terrorism. Is Hezbollah a national liberation movement or, as Israel and its supporters maintain, a murderous global menace? To a great many people in this part of the world, to label Hezbollah a terrorist organization is to choose sides in the defining conflict of the Middle East, an intensely political decision for any government. Neil MacDonald, CBC News, Beirut.
A Toronto Star report on December 13th offered more detail of CBC reporter Neil Macdonald's findings. Macdonald, the article reported, who traveled to Lebanon to investigate:
"...could not make the facts fit with Martin's account of them. Not only did Nasrallah not make the speeches when and where Martin had reported, there was no evidence the Hezbollah leader had ever incited suicide bombers to go global.

"I watched the videos. I watched the speeches. I have done more research than maybe the Canadian government has done, certainly more than Paul Martin has done," Macdonald told me on the phone from Jordan last night. "He came up with three quotes, one of which, to be charitable, was a gross mistranslation, and the other two were never even uttered."

When CBC confronted Martin for Wednesday's edition of The National, he "got very upset and jumped up and said this interview is over." Eventually, he fingered Walid Phares, a Florida Atlantic University associate professor, as his source."

Source: Curious silence greets discredited Hezbollah tale, Antoinia Zerbisias, Toronto Star, 13 December 2002.
Of course, a simple Internet search for Walid Phares quickly identifies him as a pro-Israeli Lebanese ultra-nationalist activist who has contributed policy briefs to the Middle East Quarterly, the publication of Daniel Pipes' well known think tank, the Middle East Forum.

Once again, as in the case of statements falsely attributed to Palestinian Authority officials in the wake of the Israeli war crimes in Jenin, we must note that a "Chinese whispers" effect in the media has produced a massive real world ripple with negative consequences for a series of medical and educational facilities that are widely considered to be beneficial.

The source? A journalist who has previously propagated false information under a false indentity, who works at an irresponsible newspaper that refuses to hold him accountable. His source? A "Middle East Expert" who holds clearly partisan views.

Once again, fact checking is exposed as a seemingly insurmountable problem for media organisations covering the Middle East.

Nigel Parry

Nigel Parry is one of the founders of the Electronic Intifada.
On the one hand, you have fabrications being concocted on behalf of Israel almost daily -- never scrutinized and never retracted when proven false.

On the other, you have almost daily genocidal statements on the part of Israeli leaders -- never covered by the mainstream media and when they are, bitterly condemned as anti-Semitic simply for pointing them out.

You pretty much cannot trust a thing you read in the media *especially* about the Middle East. Not everything is lies. One of the most proven techniques is to just ignore certain inconvenient facts -- facts which go a long way to explain the conflict.
by bump
back to the top
by 2 gehrig
gehrig:

the article seems quite OK to me.

Just asks a few reasonable questions.
by gehrig
... that could, if the writer were serious, be answered in about half an hour of actual research, or even by applying some basic logic.

The use of Zyklon-B, for example, is very well documented -- manufacturing documents, transport documents, eyewitness accounts from survivors, eyewitness accounts from Nazis, and so on. It was cheap, it was easy to handle, and it worked.

The nerdcities site ignores all that documenation, though, in favor of ad hoc handwaving and conspiracy mongering.

@%<
by ...
Personally I find questioning the Holocaust offensive.

I subscribe to what Noam Chomsky said: "To even discuss the matter is to already demean yourself."

That being said, the Holocaust is irrelevant to the Palestine question because Palestinians had nothing to do with it and should not be punished for it.
by gehrig
Although the appearance of both rabidly anti-Zionist _and_ Holocaust denial materials on the same site does serve as a reminder that not all those who oppose Israel do so out of the purest of motivations.

But -- back to the topic at hand -- it certainly doesn't do much to enhance the site's reputation for rationality over crackpottery, which in turn reflects on their material about the WTC.

@%<
by zian
Just great ! Now humanity must concern themselves with the demonic conspiracy for world conquest by the dreaded Rex 84ians and their hooded , skinhead stooges. Hey , you forgot to mention the mysterious underground bases in the north pole and their secret flying saucers. ---But who am I to question firebrand truth seekers from reputable sources such as UPI , Los Angeles Times , Houston Post , and the Oakland Tribune. Now thats a fine , classy bunch I would put my faith in anyday. Would'nt you ? Not to mention a couple of ' history as extortion' authors looking for their cut in some massive transfer of funds lawsuit against I.G. Farben , IBM , etc. Of course , working people will be more than happy to pick up the tab for any passed along corporate losses. They always do. BTW --- hope no one notices my cryptic name - I might get thrown in jail for the grevious crime of - " the mother of all , one and only , true conspiracy " DENIALISM.
by debate coach
>Hey , you forgot to mention the mysterious underground bases in the north pole and their secret flying saucers.

Click here:

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html
by gehrig
Also, more specifically, for the book leading Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel wrote claiming that, yes, there was a secret Nazi UFO base at the North Pole, see

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/z/zundel-ernst/flying-saucers/

You can see Zundel himself in Errol Morris' documentary "Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter." You'll also see one of the guys Zundel introduced Holocaust denial to: David Irving.

I'd be _awfully_ embarrased to be that Nerdcities site right about now.

@%<
by ufo buff
I don't believe the Nazis had an Antarctic base with flying saucers, but at the end of WW2 there is clear evidence this was considered by the USA as possibility worthy of investigation.

UFO phenomena predates WW2. There's compelling evidence for it going back hundreds, if not thousands of years.

link

The Antarctic Enigma: Admiral Byrd's "Operation Highjump"

http://www.violations.dabsol.co.uk/enigma/enigmapart1.htm
by Pat Johnson
Conspiracy nuts abound , no doubt . But one would have to be a real opie dopey not to believe in the possibilities of secret societies with hidden agendas operating outside the public arena. The information , both factual and theoretical , obtainable on the internet are frightening enough , let alone what knowledge ' they ' could easily make sure wasn't quite so accessible. I personally have experienced two rather bizarre incidents in my life , which I won't discuss here, convincing me that strange technology [ or man made magic] exists and are in operational use. And after reading thru some of the above suggested links ,
it occurred to me that zeroing a couple of jumbo airliners into the WTC might be a piece of cake. Yet the question , like the song , remains the same. Who benefits? --sheeeesh I think I will make me a sandwich , watch the Beverly Hillbillies , and pretend it all away --for awhile.
by one of the editors
>This guy's caliber as a researcher is low.

This refers to a comment by "gehrig" which was hidden because it contained a link to a site containing Holocaust denial propaganda. You can't do that here, even if you meant well, which in this case, gehrig did.
by gehrig
... is fair enough.

@%<
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$145.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network