top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Where is the US?...French soldiers begin patrols in wartorn Congo

by James Astill in Bunia, DRC
The intervention follows the bitter failure of a small band of UN peacekeepers in Bunia to prevent a battle between ethnic groups for the town last month that claimed at least 500 lives and displaced about 250,000 people. This mission exposes the racist imperialist foreign policy of the Bush administration. Black faces don't get US protection, even in the recent genocides. Does the US public even cares? America has a double standard at home and abroad.
Under the local authority's murderous glare, a contingent of 100 French special forces landed in the north-eastern Democratic Republic of Congo's capital of Bunia yesterday to begin their intervention in the conflict that has claimed more lives than any other since the second world war.

Within minutes of their dawn arrival, the troops began securing Bunia's airstrip for an anticipated force of 1,400 European peacekeepers which may contain British soldiers.

Five British military planners also arrived in Bunia yesterday to consider the feasibility of deploying a small British team likely to comprise non-combat personnel.

The intervention follows the bitter failure of a small band of UN peacekeepers in Bunia to prevent a battle between ethnic groups for the town last month that claimed at least 500 lives and displaced about 250,000 people.

The helplessness of the blue-bereted, mostly Uruguayan force caused the first serious international attention to the civil war in Congo's north-eastern Ituri province.

"I have not given orders for battle ... and we have not encountered any enemy," the French colonel in charge said yesterday. "But if someone engages us, we have the capacity to respond."

The battle for Bunia involved the militias of the local Hema and Lendu peoples, who were armed and chaotically commanded by Uganda and Rwanda, the principal invaders who are also hostile to each other.

Many of the victorious Hema fighters - of the Union of Congolese Patriots (UPC) - had left Bunia yesterday. Of those who remained, most were unarmed. "Our orders are not to carry many guns," said Michel Ilunga, a UPC fighter toying with a water-pistol on Bunia's main street. "We won't fight the French."

The US will not fund the non-UN force; yet Uganda and Rwanda are thought to have approved the intervention only at its bidding, loosening their grasp on Congo's fabulously mineral-rich north-east.

"This is the first window of opportunity for peace in eastern Congo," said François Grignon, of the International Crisis Group, one of the few analysts focused on a war that has claimed an estimated 4.7 million lives. "This intervention is a very promising start, but much more must still be done."

France agreed to lead the force after the UN admitted its inability to stop the war which has been described by some, even in the UN, as a genocide.

The European force has a more belligerent mandate to protect Congo's brutalised civilians than the Uruguayans had. Yet, crucially, according to Mr Grignon, it still has no plans to patrol Bunia's outlying hills, or to remain in Congo after the arrival of more UN peacekeepers in September.

"These soldiers are to do a specific task in Bunia," said Col Daniel Vollot, the commander of UN forces in Ituri. "They have no orders to leave the town."

That will provide little reassurance to the majority of Ituri's people, who have witnessed their friends and family being murdered by the hundred in the tit-for-tat massacres raging outside the town.

But Bunia was already recovering yesterday. In its makeshift clinic, Kapo Adiu, a nurse, reported no new cases of wounded in over two weeks.

In its main market - formerly littered with corpses - a few vendors did a roaring trade in cigarettes, medicine and soap.



Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003.
by Vet (Saigon, Nha Trang & Long Binh)
There is no oil there - so no U.S. soldiers. Look at the White House = only oil related people. Cheney - Halliburton (builds refineries and pipeline), Bush the lesser (he ran an oil company to the ground in Texas, until Papa bush had one of his Saudi friends bail out his son by buying out Harken Oil), Con Rice (former Chevron exec who even had a tanker named after her - until she was in the "white" house <yes - I know she isn't white, but, similar to Powell (both Colin and Michael) there are some Blacks that may as well be white cos they r happy with the few token thrown their way; the list goes on - read people - gain knowledge - read Stupid White Men by Michael Moore, The Best Democracy $$$ Can Buy by Palast, 9-11 by Norm Chromsky or Dirty Truths by Michael Parenti. Or log on to DemocracyNow.org and listen. Don't let the brain-washing by the media continue.
by Sgt. Hartman
How about they solve their own problems instead of constantly "demanding" the America fix it for them?

And then whine because we didn't do it right.
by Saddam
Dear Sgt Mineclearer or what ever you name

We did not have a problem in Iraq until you yankess came. Now their is crime just like America. Before we have peace between factions now we are at civil war. Go home and fix crime and drugs and 11,000 gun muders a year and 1in 5 american Children in poverty and gang violence and and and and and ..........
by Dave
There was no problem in Iraq? Oh, ok, whatever you say buddy.

As far as US involvement in Congo, this is a EU operation, not a UN operation. France isn't exactly committed to a whole lot of places right now, so I dont think its too hard for them to send a few hundred of their soldiers to the Congo to support this EU force.. And their soldiers are really quite good despite all the jokes, so I dont see any reason for the US to be there.
by Johnny:P
I mean no offence to the two of you, but i simply have to state the obvious : you are both looking at this with a far too subjective view. Not that there is such a thing as an objective view, because that would be an ideal. I think the obvious is that : yes the United-States interest in Iraq was purely to exploit and still is(not to mention the geo-political advantages), this is why they are not entering, or simply don't care for the Congo, at the moment they don't stand to gain much from sending their soldiers there. As for the implicit comment that they already have soldiers working in different countries, unlike France, therefore don't send anyone there, that is simply ridiculous. I mean, for fuck sakes, I assure you the United States has more than enough soldiers and also the funds. As for there was no problem in Iraq, there obviously was, but I simply can't tell whether the United-States has improved the situation in Iraq or has worsened it. Oh yes, and for " instead of constantly "demanding" the America fix it for them". That is by far the most fatuous, inane comment anyone has ever made. Yes! Yes, the United-States and other G-7 countries are certainly expected to help. Perhaps, if the United-States and other countries ( but specially the states) didn't go around playing God, deciding what is good and not for other countries and imposing their culture and moral beliefs on others, then perhaps, just perhaps they wouldn't be expected to help in this situation. Man, must i remind you of all the times the United-States has interfered with African countries, and yet now they don't. Why do you think that is ? Because before it served some gain to them, and in this case it doesn't!
And for the times the states has interfered with other African countries, they are far too numerous to mention, but please, if you don't believe me go look it up in the CIA archive files.
by Alex
To Sgt. Hartman and all the other people out there who believe that American just minds it's own business and only attacks others when it itself is threatened with attack. This is an illusion that is fostered by the government and mainstream media. The truth is that the American government is and has been an interventionist (almost always on the behalf of big business) power deeply involved in one way or another throughout the world since at least 1846 when Commodore James Biddle was sent to Japan by President Jackson in order demand a trade treaty with the isolationist Japanese in order largely to protect the American Whaling Industry around Japanese waters. Of course the Japanese refused the treaty with the result that the heavily armed Naval Armada of Admiral Commodore Perry was dispatched in 1852 in order to demand a trade treaty with the Japanese or else!

The instances of interventionism and meddling in foreign politics since are two numerous to list but some of the accounts are available from the books Killing Hope by William Blum and A Peoples History Of The United States By Howard Zinn. Or the following web sites for more info:

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com http://www.serendipity.li/cia.html http://www.michaelparenti.org/ http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/index.cfm
http://www.fas.org/man/smedley.htm
http://www.americanstateterrorism.com/vietnamgenocide/MyLaiPhoenix.html

While you can bet that U.S. government will not be sending large numbers of U.S. troops anywhere that does not affect the interests of big business or economic expansionism it may be a good thing since if the U.S. Military was to get involved in the Congo you could probably add another 3 or 4 million more deaths to the toll.
by French!
I might add that the French are really no better then the U.S. I mean does anybody really believe that their interest in not going to war with Iraq was out of the goodness of their hearts? Get real! They didn't want a war with Iraq because if Saddam's regime was toppled the future of the French Oil Companies investments with Saddam's regime would be compromised. The French government did not abstain from war because it cares about the average Kurd or Iraqi. If the French were in the position of power the U.S. is in they would behave very similarly (in fact this is historically accurate for any nation-state) and if you doubt this then read up on the history of French Imperialism in Indochina 1858-1954.
by Bob (cheroitaliana [at] hotmail.com)
Where is the outrage at this invasion of a country? You people deplore the military, so shouldn't you have some protests or the like? Think about all the innocent people who will be killed. Is France going to the Congo for the minerals?
The U.S. is not in the Congo because we do not need to be the world's police force. In addition, we do not want to get involved in civil wars. Yes, we went into the Balkans. The europeans begged us to go because when a large military operation is required, everyone, except Iraq, requests assistance or leadership from the U.S.
Get over the oil thing. If we wanted Iraqi oil, we would simply have lifted the sanctions against Iraq. We would also open up our markets to Iran. This would certainly ended OPEC.
Back to the Congo. When and where are the protests?
by debate coach
>we do not want to get involved in civil wars. Yes, we went into the Balkans.

These two things contradict each other.
by Bob
We only went to the Balkans after being pursuaded by the rest of the world, including the Europeans. In fact, I remember some contries saying that they could not end the violence without the U.S. I still think we should have left that one to the Europeans. They can simply drive to the Balkans.
by Weirdo
This is NOT NEWS. The most horrific massacres were happening during the sortie that we called the Iraq war. More people were killed in a single day there than in several weeks of fighting in Iraq. All that Indymedia could talk about was Iraq or, for a brief change of pace, Israel and Palestine. Where were the protests, the demands the killing stop in the Congo. Why is this only news now? I'll tell you: you're as prejudiced and blind as the national leaders you despise. The Congo is the new hot topic since Iraq and I/P have been rehashed to the point of near irrelevance. You are all hypocrites and liars. You care only about the flavor of the month. Show some love and respect for someone other than the Muslims in the Middle East.
by just wondering
>We only went to the Balkans after being pursuaded by the rest of the world,

What are you trying to say here, that we only want to get involved in civil wars if the rest of the world pursuades us, or we don't want to get involved in civil wars, period?

Both cannot be true. They are mutually preclusive. So which is it?
by ERISS
THERE IS oil: Offshore.
French company TotalFina/Elf has drugged and armed for years 3 clans for savage slaughters to prevent democracy, prevent sharing profit with local people. French parliament was aware of this.
by ben
> Get real! They didn't want a war with Iraq because if
> Saddam's regime was toppled the future of the
> French Oil Companies investments with Saddam's > regime would be compromised.
:) I doubt than even Chiraq believed that he could force 150.000 pre-positioned GIs to return home without having fired their weapons. Oil companies's interests are _now_ compromised in Iraq, and it is a perfectly “foreseeable” consequence of the Chirac policy (And he was aware of that). It would have been 100 times easier for France to politically back USA despite the hostile public opinion, then to let the USA do the dirty job, and to finally take advantage of lucrative post-war contracts (Have a look to Italy and Spain leaders policy!)

> French were in the position of power the U.S. is in
> they would behave very similarly (in fact this is
> historically accurate for any nation-state) and if you
> doubt this then read up on the history of French
> Imperialism in Indochina 1858-1954.
France has learnt the hard way that imperialism is now longer a politically viable option (70.000 French soldier died in Indochina). Despite a clear military "victory", Algeria was decolonized, and the same process has repeated for African colonies.

by Been there
The US is in the Congo. Who do you think funds the Rwandan troops!? I was there flying 'Rwandan Rebels' to places like Bunia, Kongolo, etc. Troops are trained by Russian Mercenaries, supplied with Russian armament, all bought with US cash. Where does that US cash come from you ask. A US registered aircraft delivers it in the night!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network