top
Iraq
Iraq
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

The Colder War

by Leedy, R
Here's an excellent warning from John Pilger, whom you may know as the Aussie
journalist who produced a significant movie, Paying the Price, on the post-desert-slaughter Iraqi society.

In this article he mentions Orwell's 1984, a book which bears rereading.
In the book, one of the mechanisms used for the control of the population is
fear brought on by constant war. The entire book is amazingly prescient.



From: http://pilger.carlton.com

The Colder War

John Pilger
January 29, 2002

LAST week, the US government announced that it was building the biggest-ever
war machine. Military spending will rise to $379billion, of which $50billion
will pay for its "war on terrorism". There will be special funding for new,
refined weapons of mass slaughter and for "military operations" -- invasions
of
other countries.

Of all the extraordinary news since September 11, this is the most alarming.
It
is time to break our silence.

That is to say, it is time for other governments to break their silence,
especially the Blair government, whose complicity in the American rampage in
Afghanistan has not denied its understanding of the Bush administration's
true
plans and ambitions.

The recent statements of British Ministers about the "vindication" of the
"outstanding success" in Afghanistan would be comical if the price of their
"success" had not been paid with the lives of more than 5,000 innocent
Afghani
civilians and the failure to catch Osama bin Laden and anyone else of
importance in the al-Qaeda network.

The Pentagon's release of deliberately provocative pictures of prisoners at
Camp X-Ray on Cuba was meant to conceal this failure from the American
public,
who are being conditioned, along with the rest of us, to accept a permanent
war
footing similar to the paranoia that sustained and prolonged the Cold War.

The threat of "terrorism", some of it real, most of it invented, is the new
Red
Scare. The parallels are striking.

IN AMERICA in the 1950s, the Red Scare was used to justify the growth of war
industries, the suspension of democratic rights and the silencing of
dissenters.

That is happening now.

Above all, the American industrial-complex has a new enemy with which to
justify its gargantuan appetite for public resources -- the new military
budget
is enough to end all primary causes of poverty in the world.

Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, says he has told the Pentagon to
"think
the unthinkable".

Vice President Dick Cheney, the voice of Bush, has said the US is
considering
military or other action against "40 to 50 countries" and warns that the new
war may last 50 years or more.

A Bush adviser, Richard Perle, explained. "(There will be) no stages," he
said.

"This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of
them out there ... If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we
embrace it entirely, and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy but
just wage a total war, our children will sing great songs about us years
from
now."

Their words evoke George Orwell's great prophetic work, Nineteen
Eighty-Four.
In the novel, three slogans dominate society: war is peace, freedom is
slavery
and ignorance is strength. Today's slogan, war on terrorism, also reverses
meaning. The war is terrorism.

The next American attack is likely to be against Somalia, a deeply
impoverished
country in the Horn of Africa. Washington claims there are al-Qaeda
terrorist
cells there.

This is almost certainly a fiction spread by Somalia's overbearing
neighbour,
Ethiopia, in order to ingratiate itself with Washington. Certainly, there
are
vast oil fields off the coast of Somalia. For the Americans, there is the
added
attraction of "settling a score".

In 1993, in the last days of George Bush Senior's presidency, 18 American
soldiers were killed in Somalia after the US Marines had invaded to "restore
hope", as they put it. A current Hollywood movie, Black Hawk Down,
glamorises
and lies about this episode. It leaves out the fact that the invading
Americans
left behind between 7,000 and 10,000 Somalis killed.

Like the victims of American bombing in Afghanistan, and Iraq, and Cambodia,
and Vietnam and many other stricken countries, the Somalis are unpeople,
whose
deaths have no political and media value in the West.

WHEN Bush Junior's heroic marines return in their Black Hawk gunships,
loaded
with technology, looking for "terrorists", their victims will once again be
nameless. We can then expect the release of Black Hawk Down II.

Breaking our silence means not allowing the history of our lifetimes to be
written this way, with lies and the blood of innocent people. To understand
the
lie of what Blair/Straw/Hoon call the "outstanding success" in Afghanistan,
read the work of the original author of "Total War", a man called Zbigniew
Brzezinski, who was President Carter's National Security Adviser and is
still a
powerful force in Washington.

Brzezinski not long ago revealed that on July 3, 1979, unknown to the
American
public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly authorised $500million
to
create an international terrorist movement that would spread Islamic
fundamentalism in Central Asia and "destabilise" the Soviet Union.

The CIA called this Operation Cyclone and in the following years poured
$4billion into setting up Islamic training schools in Pakistan (Taliban
means
"student").

Young zealots were sent to the CIA's spy training camp in Virginia, where
future members of al-Qaeda were taught "sabotage skills" -- terrorism.
Others
were recruited at an Islamic school in Brooklyn, New York, within sight of
the
fated Twin Towers.

In Pakistan, they were directed by British MI6 officers and trained by the
SAS.
The result, quipped Brzezinski, was "a few stirred up Muslims" -- meaning
the
Taliban.

At that time, the late 1970s, the American goal was to overthrow
Afghanistan's
first progressive, secular government, which had granted equal rights to
women,
established health care and literacy programmes and set out to break
feudalism.
When the Taliban seized power in 1996, they hanged the former president from
a
lamp-post in Kabul.

His body was still a public spectacle when Clinton administration officials
and
oil company executives were entertaining Taliban leaders in Washington and
Houston, Texas. The Wall Street Journal declared: "The Taliban are the
players
most capable of achieving peace. Moreover, they were crucial to secure the
country as a prime trans-shipment route for the export of Central Asia's
vast
oil, gas and other natural resources."

NO AMERICAN newspaper dares suggest that the prisoners in Camp X-Ray are the
product of this policy, nor that it was one of the factors that led to the
attacks of September 11. Nor do they ask: who were the real winners of
September 11?

The day the Wall Street stock market opened after the destruction of the
Twin
Towers, the few companies showing increased value were the giant military
contractors Alliant Tech Systems, Northrop Gruman, Raytheon (a contributor
to
New Labour) and Lockheed Martin. As the US military's biggest supplier,
Lockheed Martin's share value rose by a staggering 30 per cent.

Within six weeks of September 11, the company (with its main plant in Texas,
George Bush's home state) had secured the biggest military order in history:
a
$200billion contract to develop a new fighter aircraft. The greatest taboo
of
all, which Orwell would surely recognise, is the record of the United States
as
a terrorist state and haven for terrorists.

This truth is virtually unknown by the American public and makes a mockery
of
Bush's (and Blair's) statements about "tracking down terrorists wherever
they
are". They don't have to look far.

Florida, currently governed by the President's brother, Jeb Bush, has given
refuge to terrorists who, like the September 11 gang, have hijacked aircraft
and boats with guns and knives. Most have never had criminal charges brought
against them.

Why? All of them are anti-Castro Cubans. Former Guatemalan Defence Minister
Gramajo Morales, who was accused of "devising and directing an
indiscriminate
campaign of terror against civilians", including the torture of an American
nun
and the massacre of eight people from one family, studied at Harvard
University
on a US government scholarship.

During the 1980s, thousands of people were murdered by death squads
connected
to the army of El Salvador, whose former chief now lives comfortably in
Florida. The former Haitian dictator, General Prosper Avril, liked to
display
the bloodied victims of his torture on television. When he was overthrown,
he
was flown to Florida by the US government, and granted political asylum.

A leading member of the Chilean military during the reign of General
Pinochet,
whose special responsibility was executions and torture, lives in Miami. THE
Iranian general who ran Iran's notorious prisons, is a wealthy exile in the
US.
One of Pol Pot's senior henchmen, who enticed Cambodian exiles back to their
certain death, lives in Mount Vernon, New York.

What all these people have in common, apart from their history of terrorism,
is
that they either worked directly for the US government or carried out the
dirty
work of US policies.

The al-Qaeda training camps are kindergartens compared with the world's
leading
university of terrorism at Fort Benning in Georgia. Known until recently as
the
School of the Americas, its graduates include almost half the cabinet
ministers
of the genocidal regimes in Guatemala, two-thirds of the El Salvadorean army
officers who committed, according to the United Nations, the worst
atrocities
of that country's civil war, and the head of Pinochet's secret police, who
ran
Chile's concentration camps.

There is terrible irony at work here. The humane response of people all over
the world to the terrorism of September 11 has long been hijacked by those
running a rapacious great power with a history of terrorism second to none.
Global supremacy, not the defeat of terrorism, is the goal; only the
politically blind believe otherwise.

The "widening gap between the world's "haves" and "have nots"', says a
remarkably candid document of the US Space Command, presents "new
challenges"
to the world's superpower and which can only be met by "Full Spectrum
Dominance" -- dominance of land, sea, air and space.
by Crazy Canuk
With this articles and others i have read i really cant get away from my decision of Bush being a (Neo)Nazi. I may not have the full picture but i have read many articles pertaining to this topic adn they all lead to...bush is creatign a genecide(in loose terms) to Afghans, even though its not afghans they are after. He is buildign a war machine... too take them down...America has the power too take over the world...tehy are the superpower...they are the Nazi's some people may not see it but other do. I see it as Bush Administration...Hitlers S.S. Canada...Europe...Occupied France and other european countries...Now im gonna turn my tide adn contradict myself...i beleave waht bush WAS doign WAS right...attacking the Al Quada and Terrorist networks...but now he is attacking old enemies of his father...Iraq...he is saying it IS for the terrorists...but why so late...why didnt he start tat crusade at the same time as others (maybe because he doesnt want to open Two Fronts...like hitler did)...thats my 2 cents...it may not be full or partial..but hell that is my view... the view of an average 16 year old American...i mean Canadian!
by anon
I'm assuming you're just starting out trying to analyze what's going on.

Two words: Noam Chomsky

Don't fall in the trap of just eating up everyone he says - while he may be right on many topics, other people are often right on the same topics in different ways; i.e. there are many valid conclusions, some of which he makes. But Noam Chomsky is an excellent analysis of US foreign policy.

One starting point is the book _Manufacturing Consent_, by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. There's a huge amount of material at ZNet's Chomsky Archive:

http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/
by fred freedom
OK, so you are saying that we should have just allowed Al Qaeda to continue to operate unchallenged with full support of the Taliban government? That there was no need for military action in Afghanistan? That the people of Afghanistan are somehow worse off now than under the Taliban?

Get a grip! Hundreds of thousands more Afghanis are going to be able to eat this winter. In the end, far more Afghanis will live now that the Taliban have been driven out than have died in the (very limited) military action.

And yes, there probably are (or were) terrorist camps in Somalia. Get a grip! Anyone with money and weapons in Somalia can do pretty much whatever they please. While I wish a stable anarcho-capitialist system could come into being in Somalia, the reality is that terrorist organizations are going to use the country's lack of government to their advantage.

by Office of Homeland Security
Ridge here. Thanks for intervening in this debate on the side of truth and democracy. Obviously, the VeriChip implanted in your brain last week is doing its job. Even your name has a nice Orwellian ring to it.

You've been such a good troll that I'm enclosing a gift certificate worth $100.00 at our online store, Homeland Security.com.

Congratulations, fred!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network