According to Bush, Ariel Sharon, "The Butcher of Beirut," is "A Man of Peac

According to President Bush, Israel's prime minister, Ariel
Sharon, is "a man of peace". By now we are used to
Orwellian statements from our politicians, but this one was
especially audacious. Yet it displayed a remarkable timidity,
the kind of fear that used to cause Stalin's groveling flunkies
to pay absurd tributes to their boss. Bush is clearly afraid
of Sharon and can't stand up to him. Eyeball to eyeball
with his "ally," Bush blinked, ignominiously.

Even Israel's most Stakhanovite American apologists would
never make such a claim for Sharon. They will defend his
most brutal measures, but they aren't stupid enough to
pretend that the Butcher of Beirut has a streak of Gandhi in him. They insult our intelligence
with more subtlety and plausibility.

But just as the old Soviet Union had its "useful idiots" in the West, so does Israel. There is this
difference: the pro-Soviet idiots were liberals. Israel's idiots are mostly conservatives.
The NEW YORK TIMES reports that the conservative movement is rallying behind Sharon and
criticizing Bush for giving him insufficient backing.

No wonder I was never quite comfortable in the conservative movement. I was emotionally
pro-Israel from the 1967 Six-Day War until Sharon's murderous assault on Lebanon in 1982. But
just as I was bailing out, other conservatives were climbing aboard.

Did I miss something? Was there a great convention of leading conservative thinkers at which it
was decided that American support for Israel was compatible with conservative principles? I
thought we were against foreign aid and in favor of putting American interests first. I was under
the impression that Americans shouldn't be taxed to subsidize socialist countries abroad. I could
have sworn we were supposed to be living under the U.S. Constitution.

I guess I was wrong. It seems that most conservative support for Israel has nothing to
do with the Constitution or any sort of conservative philosophy; it's based on a peculiar
reading of the Bible, especially popular among fundamentalist Protestants, according to
which the Holy Land, from the Nile to the Euphrates, belongs to the Jews eternally. And
this naive theology -- which Bush seems to share -- is supposed to govern American
foreign policy, no matter what the cost to American interests and principles.

For such conservatives we are not just fighting a "war on terrorism"; we are quite literally fighting
a holy war, in which one side is altogether righteous and godly, while the other is evil and satanic.
In such a war the enemy has no rights.

It follows that just as the ancient Israelites slew their enemies down to the last infant
and domestic animal, today's Israelis may slaughter Palestinians without restraint. These
pro-Israel Christians -- who don't care whether Israel despises their faith or oppresses their
fellow Christians (a subject they carefully avoid mentioning) -- are more fanatical than most
Jewish supporters of Israel. By their gruesome standards, Sharon may indeed pass for a man of
peace.

And what does America gain by pouring
billions of dollars into Israel, making bitter
enemies, and appalling its traditional allies?
Nothing. That's the interesting part. Nobody
believes that the alliance with Israel, which
helped provoke the 9/11 attacks, has
profited us in any way. What Israel's
Christian useful idiots do believe is that
backing Israel's most extreme claims is
America's duty to God, no matter what the
price in human blood -- including American
blood. It seems odd that such people should
wave the American flag. It seems even odder
that they should claim the Cross.

Of course there are other Christians, the Pope
among them, who doubt that Ariel Sharon
would enjoy the hearty endorsement of Jesus
Christ. These Christians would prefer a
peaceful settlement that respected the rights of
both the Jews and the Palestinians. So would many Jews; but the voices of such pacific
Christians and Jews are being drowned out.

Bush's support for Sharon, polarizing the Western and Muslim worlds, must be highly gratifying to
the forgotten man: Osama bin Laden. A holy war is just what he has long had in mind.

A world in which people make peaceful adjustments and accommodations to each other -- in
other words, a truly conservative world -- is not what bin Laden dreams of. In Sharon he has the
kind of Jew he wants. In America he is now getting the kind of Christians he wants.