Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Buying Your Brain With Your Money For War
Bush Administration Launches Unprecedented $200 Million Propaganda Campaign To Win You Over On Iraq War (using your money to do it!)
George W. Bush and his staff can get any and all media time they want simply by calling up a journalist and saying, "Hey, want an interview?" But the "Bullypulpit" has limitations, all the more so given the FACT that the case Bush and Blair have made is flimsy, at best.
So, what's a "good" president to do? Slippery Karl Rove and other notorious spin master advisors have apparently decided to buy some insurance. The administration is going to spend $200 million dollars to target emotions (advertising). Reason alone (media debate) simply isn't enough. The Times in the U.K. published a news story about this today, and it appears to be the first media "trial balloon" (see excerpt below).
Last Fall, Tony Blair's government published a dossier on Osama Bin Laden. No money for advertising was needed to seed that document's message and justifications.
When a US administration feels the need to spend what amounts to about 35% of what was spent in all advertising and campaigning in the 2000 presidential elections, you know they're worried about winning your brain. Drawing an analogy to the corrupting influences of the campaign financing system is apropos on more than one count, for the US media greatly benefits during election years. The argument can be made that media corporations have a vested interest in keeping a one dollar, one vote system alive. We now stand at the crossroads where the media and politicians may develop a vested interest in dollars for individual policies, never mind elections. With our money, the magnitude of financing emotion (not reason) campaigns for political ends is here.
For the record, to counter any debate about the policy in advance, there is significant difference between this PR campaign (funds used partly for domestic propaganda) and comparables like the money used to support operations like Radio Marti, beaming to Cuba. Radio Marti is about money spent to influence Cubans in Cuba. This week's insane Bush "PR" proposal is partly about spending your money to influence your mind, brought to you by the administration that openly discusses "selling" a plan for war on Iraq as a "new product," packaged and launched for your consumption.
It's bad enough that we live in a system that corporations can abuse with their money. Now we have a nation were our tax dollars are used in a similar manner.
God bless the United States of Plutocracy
==========================
September 17, 2002
America plans PR blitz on Saddam
From Tim Reid in Washington
THE TIMES (UK)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-418110,00.html
The Bush Administration is to launch a multimillion-dollar PR blitz against Saddam Hussein, using advertising techniques to persuade crucial target groups that the Iraqi leader must be ousted.
The campaign will consist of dossiers of evidence detailing Saddam’s breaches of UN resolutions, and will be launched this week at American and foreign audiences, particularly in Arab nations sceptical of US policy in the region.
The White House is aware that it lacks substantial new intelligence on Saddam’s nuclear programme or evidence directly linking Baghdad to the September 11 attacks. But it will build on the contents of President’s Bush’s speech made to the UN General Assembly last week, in which he listed Saddam’s violations of UN resolutions.
The campaign, which will initially receive over $200 million (£130 million), will be overseen by the Office of Global Communications, whose existence will not be formally announced until next month.
<end>
So, what's a "good" president to do? Slippery Karl Rove and other notorious spin master advisors have apparently decided to buy some insurance. The administration is going to spend $200 million dollars to target emotions (advertising). Reason alone (media debate) simply isn't enough. The Times in the U.K. published a news story about this today, and it appears to be the first media "trial balloon" (see excerpt below).
Last Fall, Tony Blair's government published a dossier on Osama Bin Laden. No money for advertising was needed to seed that document's message and justifications.
When a US administration feels the need to spend what amounts to about 35% of what was spent in all advertising and campaigning in the 2000 presidential elections, you know they're worried about winning your brain. Drawing an analogy to the corrupting influences of the campaign financing system is apropos on more than one count, for the US media greatly benefits during election years. The argument can be made that media corporations have a vested interest in keeping a one dollar, one vote system alive. We now stand at the crossroads where the media and politicians may develop a vested interest in dollars for individual policies, never mind elections. With our money, the magnitude of financing emotion (not reason) campaigns for political ends is here.
For the record, to counter any debate about the policy in advance, there is significant difference between this PR campaign (funds used partly for domestic propaganda) and comparables like the money used to support operations like Radio Marti, beaming to Cuba. Radio Marti is about money spent to influence Cubans in Cuba. This week's insane Bush "PR" proposal is partly about spending your money to influence your mind, brought to you by the administration that openly discusses "selling" a plan for war on Iraq as a "new product," packaged and launched for your consumption.
It's bad enough that we live in a system that corporations can abuse with their money. Now we have a nation were our tax dollars are used in a similar manner.
God bless the United States of Plutocracy
==========================
September 17, 2002
America plans PR blitz on Saddam
From Tim Reid in Washington
THE TIMES (UK)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-418110,00.html
The Bush Administration is to launch a multimillion-dollar PR blitz against Saddam Hussein, using advertising techniques to persuade crucial target groups that the Iraqi leader must be ousted.
The campaign will consist of dossiers of evidence detailing Saddam’s breaches of UN resolutions, and will be launched this week at American and foreign audiences, particularly in Arab nations sceptical of US policy in the region.
The White House is aware that it lacks substantial new intelligence on Saddam’s nuclear programme or evidence directly linking Baghdad to the September 11 attacks. But it will build on the contents of President’s Bush’s speech made to the UN General Assembly last week, in which he listed Saddam’s violations of UN resolutions.
The campaign, which will initially receive over $200 million (£130 million), will be overseen by the Office of Global Communications, whose existence will not be formally announced until next month.
<end>
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
it is always a sign of failure of government policies when they must be twisted, spun, and caked in rosy makeup. i have heard that this "office of global communications" also plans on launching an advertising campaign about the beauty and goodness of america, directed at an arabic audience in arabic nations over arabic cable networks. apparently, nowhere in the ads will it show who produced the ads or who paid for them.
now, imagine you're a young arabic person who has access to the internet. you've noticed recently some strange, propaganda-ish, doublespeak advertisements on your t.v. that have no source. also, their timing is fishy. the more u.s military activity in the region, the more bellicose america talks, the more frequently the ads appear. so you get on the net and do some research about them.
it doesn't take long to find out that its all part of a program run by the pretentious sounding "office of global communications". lets not fuck with ourselves. this office is the propaganda arm of the u.s government. "communication" is a two way street, between two different sides. but this office's sole purpose is to spew propaganda, one way. they don't want a conversation with anyone.
so, if you're this young arabic person who finds these strange ads with their suspicious timing are the property of the u.s government, will you feel:
happy?
will you suddenly feel grateful that you have been on the dirty business end of u.s foreign policy for decades?
will your heart be filled with raptorous joy upon the sight of u.s fighter-bombers and helicopter gunships flying over your city?
will you sudenly feel that whatever the israel gov. does to the palestinians, shitting on them daily, well it's suddenly fine and dandy with you?...
Give Me A Fucking Break, you idiots in washington. No Amount of syrupy pap is going to erase the legacy of the u.s. geo-political power game in the middle east. it seems laughable that people in washington beleive they can advertise their way out of this problem. how fucking deluded...
also, i think it points to the absolute lack of respect and closet hatred the "professionals" in washington have toward the general public in any nation, even america. they seem to think the public is only good for lies and distortions and spin and rosy pictures. gee, thanks assholes. nice to know i'm not worthy of the facts.
oh, oh, i see. so i'm a palestinian, and you're saying i didn't just see an american built apache gunship fire a hell fire missile into an apartment building accross the street, it didn't kill some friends, i shouldn't be angry, and the u.s loves me and wants peace for all the world, because that's what the u.s gov. ad says...
what a sad fucking joke. i hope this fails, because it shouldn't have been a strategy to begin with.