top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Union of Concerned Scientists Position on Biotechnology

by links to biotech dicussions
UCS does not support or oppose genetic engineering per se. With respect to some applications, such as the production of pharmaceuticals by genetically engineered bacteria, the benefits are clear and compelling. In the food system, however, we find the risk-benefit calculus more difficult. For example, while it is possible that planting genetically engineered crops might reduce some pesticide use over the short term, it is also possible that a new breed of super-resistant weeds will develop, compounding the already difficult task of controlling invasive species.
Because the technology is new, data from field research are scarce. Thus, there is little certainty about either the risks or the benefits from many of the agricultural biotechnology products now entering the marketplace. (For a comprehensive assessment of the current state of research, see “The Ecological Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Plants,” Science, 15 December 2000.) And yet, the technology is being commercialized at a rapid pace and on a large scale.

We believe that the federal government must strengthen the regulatory system governing genetically engineered microorganisms, plants, and animals, so that the risks and benefits can be evaluated carefully, case by case, before they come to market. That is the fundamental goal of our program on Food and the Environment, and we are working hard to achieve it.

We also believe that we need better opportunities for civil society to debate the appropriateness of agricultural biotechnology and direct its course. Regulatory programs provide one such opportunity; food labeling represents another. Not only do consumers have the right to know what they are eating, but with labeling they can use purchasing decisions to influence the extent to which producers rely on the technology. Until much more is known about the risks and benefits, this is clearly a prudent course.

Genetic engineering raises complex and difficult issues. UCS has an important role to play in helping the public to understand what is known and not known.

http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology/page.cfm?pageID=1029


Environmental Effects of Genetically Modified Food Crops
Recent Experiences
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology/page.cfm?pageID=1219

Ecological Risks of Engineered Organisms
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology_archive/page.cfm?pageID=335

Roundup Ready Soybeans
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology_archive/page.cfm?pageID=361

How Does Seed Contamination Occur?
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology/page.cfm?pageID=1372

Pharm and Industrial Crops
The Next Wave of Agricultural Biotechnology
http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology/page.cfm?pageID=1033

Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network