top
Americas
Americas
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

US goverment tries to cover up covert funds to Opposition in Venezuela

by Venezuela Solidarity Committee
United States government tries to cover up covert financing to the Venezuelan opposition and Sumate to the tune of US$10 million
by Eva Golinger-Moncada
Venezuela Solidarity Committee (New York)

Documents recently obtained from the US Department of State under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by http://www.venezuelafoia.info demonstrate that during the past 2 years more than US$5 million annually was given by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to various organizations in Venezuela, many of which are aligned with the opposition.

One of the key groups collaborating with USAID is Sumate, the organization that promoted the recall referendum campaign against President Hugo Chavez and which is now rejecting results certified by the most credible international observers and even by the US government.

Sumate, despite its numerous undemocratic positions and actions, has also been a recipient of US government funds from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in 2003.

However, new documents obtained by Venezuelafoia.info have all been censored by the US government despite the use of the FOIA, which is intended to ensure transparency in US government operations.

The Department of State has withheld the names of the organizations receiving financing from USAID by misapplying a FOIA exemption that is intended to protect “personnel and medical files” of individuals.

Such clear censorship indicates that USAID and the US government clearly have something to hide regarding their collaborations with the Venezuelan opposition. Despite USAID’s ongoing crusade to encourage transparency in foreign governments, the withholding of information that does not fall under any available exemptions clearly demonstrates a double standard applied by the US government in this case.

USAID is financed by the US Congress and controlled by the US Department of State. Founded by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, USAID was established as a fund dedicated to humanitarian intervention around the world. Despite Kennedy’s humane intentions, USAID has more recently been used, in many instances, as a mechanism to promote the interests of the US in strategically important countries around the world.

In the case of Venezuela, USAID maintains a private contractor in Caracas monitoring and facilitating its projects and funds and also has a local operating center, the Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) that was established in 2002, after the failed coup d’etat against President Chavez. The private contractor, Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI), manages and supervises grants approved by USAID to Venezuelan organizations.

Under a program entitled Venezuela: Initiative to Build Confidence, DAI has awarded 67 grants to Venezuelan organizations in various sectors and areas of interest. These grants equal US$2.3 million ... just during 2003. In total, DAI ‘s program in Venezuela counts on US$10,000,000 in funding for the period August 2002 through August 2004 -­ US$5 million annually to “focus on common goals for the future of Venezuela.”

According to the documents obtained under FOIA and DAI’s project description none of the project grants or programs have been in collaboration with the Venezuelan government.

In fact, many of the same recipients of US government funds through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) have received USAID funding through DAI. Despite the illegal withholding of names on the USAID-DAI grants, one document apparently was skipped, at least in part. The name, Sumate appears on a grant intended to encourage “electoral participation” in the recall referendum, citing US$84,840 as the total grant amount.

Combined with the NED grant of US$53,400 given to Sumate in 2003-2004, the organization that is now crying fraud about the recall referendum against President Chavez ... the results of which have been recognized as absolutely credible by the Carter Center and the US Department of State ... has received, at minimum, more than US$200,000 in just one year for promoting its attempts to remove Venezuela’s President from office.

Other recipients of USAID funds through DAI which are apparent in the censored documents include the organization Liderazgo y Visión for its project, “Un Sueño para Venezuela”, (“A Dream for Venezuela”) a project created in 2002-2003 with the intent of offering an alternative vision and agenda for those opposing President Chavez’ administration. Liderazgo y Visión has also been a recipient of NED funds over the past few years.

More than 6 organizations have been given funding for political and social formation and development in Petare, a poor neighborhood in the outskirts of Caracas, in Miranda State. The work in Petare and the more than US$200,000 that have been funneled into that neighborhood in the past year, appear to have been aimed at converting a community that was traditionally pro-Chavez, into one that supports the opposition.

The recall referendum results from August 15, 2004, show the opposition gaining substantial numbers in Petare, and Miranda State was one of only two states in the entire nation that gave victory to the opposition in the referendum.

One grant from USAID/DAI focuses on the creation of radio and television commercials during the December 2002-February 2003 strike imposed by the opposition, during which the private media dedicated its airwaves 24/7 to opposition propaganda.

One of the most striking aspects of the media’s dedication to the strike was the use of anti-Chavez commercials to indoctrinate viewers’ opinions on Venezuela’s political situation. The USAID/DAI grant shows funding originating from the US government for some of these anti-Chavez commercials, collaborating with former Fedecamaras President Carlos Fernandez ... who was one of the leaders of the strike ... in the project.

These new documents from USAID evidence a clear focus on two major projects in Venezuela: The Recall Referendum and the Formation of a National Agenda that would serve as a transitional government post-Chavez (assuming the referendum was won by the opposition).

The documents are available for public viewing on http://www.venezuelafoia.info
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Eugean17
Sun, Sep 12, 2004 5:41PM
Workers Vanguard
Sun, Sep 12, 2004 5:32PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network