From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
School Beat: Building Integrated Schools
Few things are as of much interest to parents of children who will soon be entering elementary, middle or high school then how students are actually assigned to schools. In San Francisco we have had a system of family-ranked preference, called “school choice,” combined with a lottery based on socioeconomic factors for those schools receiving more requests than available openings. That system, known as the “Diversity Index,” was an effort to accommodate individual preferences while simultaneously desegregating schools and programs without using race as a factor. A tall order indeed.
At the end of last year, the legal agreement (the “Consent Decree”) that was the formal impetus behind the development of the Diversity Index expired, despite the fact that by some measures we are further away from meeting the goals of racial integration and closing the achievement gap. While the legal imperative is gone for the moment, the Board of Education, San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) administrators and many in the general community recognize the need to create schools that mirror the makeup of our city.
Integrating schools is a goal our nation has been struggling with for decades. Our commitment to it has been uncertain, as with all of our societal efforts to address the outcomes of slavery and continued discrimination in all forms. Brown vs. the Board of Education is the landmark 1954 decision outlawing “separate but equal” schools that most of us associate with desegregation. But, it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s when several other Supreme Court decisions were handed down providing more specific requirements and oversight that desegregation began in earnest.
A concise history of those efforts was recently published by the Civil Rights Project of Harvard University, which has focused a significant amount of its research energy on analyzing issues of poverty and race in the realm of public education. In their 2005 publication geared towards lay community members, “Looking to the Future: Voluntary K-12 School Integration” (http://tinyurl.com/mgtoe), the authors examine not only the history of desegregation efforts, but the disturbing trend towards resegregation, all in the effort to aid communities in implementing voluntary integration programs.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3452#more
Integrating schools is a goal our nation has been struggling with for decades. Our commitment to it has been uncertain, as with all of our societal efforts to address the outcomes of slavery and continued discrimination in all forms. Brown vs. the Board of Education is the landmark 1954 decision outlawing “separate but equal” schools that most of us associate with desegregation. But, it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s when several other Supreme Court decisions were handed down providing more specific requirements and oversight that desegregation began in earnest.
A concise history of those efforts was recently published by the Civil Rights Project of Harvard University, which has focused a significant amount of its research energy on analyzing issues of poverty and race in the realm of public education. In their 2005 publication geared towards lay community members, “Looking to the Future: Voluntary K-12 School Integration” (http://tinyurl.com/mgtoe), the authors examine not only the history of desegregation efforts, but the disturbing trend towards resegregation, all in the effort to aid communities in implementing voluntary integration programs.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3452#more
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Sorry, Lisa, but most of us stopped caring about skin color a long time ago. Why don't you give it a try? The fact is that now that SF no longer has a federal court order overseeing its schools, SF now must comply with Prop 209. This means that race can not be used for ANY aspect of school assignment. Kids should be sent to neighborhood schools so that parents can be active in their kids' schools without having to go all over town. SF public schools are now less than 9% "white", so just exactly where are you going to find all these "white" kids that "brown" kids need to sit next to to reinforce your skin color fetish? Maybe it's time for you to realize that kids are kids and the more you emphasize irrelevant details like pigment the more they think it's important. It's not.
In the past, the author has also acknowledged that over 30% of all students in SF attend private schools (the state average of students attending private school is about 10%).
If the goal is to attract more students to attend public school, then keeping up the current school and/or insisting on "desegregation" is NOT going to help.
NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS is the only way to go! If you live across the street from a public school, you should be allowed to go there. "Family-ranked perference" or "school choice" using a "lottery" does NOT work and should be abolished!
If the goal is to attract more students to attend public school, then keeping up the current school and/or insisting on "desegregation" is NOT going to help.
NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS is the only way to go! If you live across the street from a public school, you should be allowed to go there. "Family-ranked perference" or "school choice" using a "lottery" does NOT work and should be abolished!
What is wrong with a family choosing the school they want their child to go to? Why should they be forced to go to a school in their neighborhood if they would like to attend another?
are our lives richer for having friends from different class and race situations in our schools? i think so.
when you were growing up, did you know any latinos, blacks, disabled kids, whites?? these folks are all part of our society, and it's better for us to get to know each other when we are kids, so we are better prepared to interact as adults.
as an anarchist i am opposed to forcing integration, but i am also opposed to parents not being involved in educating their own kids. i am also opposed to this concept of "society," but the fact is that we all live in it.
when you were growing up, did you know any latinos, blacks, disabled kids, whites?? these folks are all part of our society, and it's better for us to get to know each other when we are kids, so we are better prepared to interact as adults.
as an anarchist i am opposed to forcing integration, but i am also opposed to parents not being involved in educating their own kids. i am also opposed to this concept of "society," but the fact is that we all live in it.
Amono asks:
<What is wrong with a family choosing the school they want their child to go to? Why should they be forced to go to a school in their neighborhood if they would like to attend another? >
Good point, families should be allowed to attend another school IF THEY CHOOSE. However, many families are force to either move or send their kids to private schools, and the 30% rate supports this, because they can't get into their neighborhood school or another school of their choice.
If any "preference" is going to be given, then those living in aneighborhood should get first priority. THEN, if there is extra room, allow in others from throughout the city.
Keeping the same old status quo of "school choice," and kiss good-bye to attracting back some of those 30%+ who are now attending private schools.
<What is wrong with a family choosing the school they want their child to go to? Why should they be forced to go to a school in their neighborhood if they would like to attend another? >
Good point, families should be allowed to attend another school IF THEY CHOOSE. However, many families are force to either move or send their kids to private schools, and the 30% rate supports this, because they can't get into their neighborhood school or another school of their choice.
If any "preference" is going to be given, then those living in aneighborhood should get first priority. THEN, if there is extra room, allow in others from throughout the city.
Keeping the same old status quo of "school choice," and kiss good-bye to attracting back some of those 30%+ who are now attending private schools.
Yes, having locals get first dibs for the local school makes sense. I just figure if the local school is not as good as another public school, the parents should have the ability to send their kids to another one.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network