Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Gewindeberg Lays Out Next Step Towards Abolition
In remarks recently delivered at Speakers Corner, Gewindeberg said the world was waiting to be presented with a proposal how to put an end to the current misery of democratic capitalism and its failure to cease its aggressions and abuses. A large part of the problem is that the misery attempts to bring about situations where few to no alternatives are possible as to influence decisions in its favour, which of course due to that happen to be more miserable than those where they are. Democratic capitalism is kind of sitting on the fence between a stampede and communism: It leans upon the intent to respect people’s choices, but actually it tightens their scope of options behind their backs. It is fundamentally flawed as it puts its own existential interests above these of the people. In a situation which renders these two categories mutually exclusive, it becomes a mortal danger to be defused.
“So where is that point beyond which a system and a population can no longer be reconciled?Where do we locate the historical fork marking the irreversible contradiction between people seeing their social system as a tool and a system that comes to regard people in that category? The working over of the question suggests that the answer is linked to a loss of asymmetry. The relationship between user and tool is asymmetric and cannot be turned around without losing that character. When the tool uses the user, e. g. the drill goes into your hand, then it is an accident. When the asymmetry is lost then it has happened. Then we need to be prepared to switch focus from phoney reconciliation with it to actively dismantling the defunct device. Of course knowing when it is going to be necessary is only one aspect of this effort. There are many more, such as how it is to be achieved or how the result is being verified.”
“We also know that for the current situation of this planet that point of loss of asymmetry in the relationship between the world population and democratic capitalism is just so far in the past that it is at risk of being forgotten. Normally our perception of time is symmetric and we are looking both into the past and into the future at the same distance, but when we bundle all our powers into one direction the natural horizon of our species is seven generations, maybe or maybe not including our own. The loss of asymmetry is now near that edge. It is threatening to get so far out of view that if we do not overrun democratic capitalism in this generation, any future attempts to do so might be requiring much wider efforts and be preceded by much bigger destructions. But for now it is crucial to know two points. One, which is when you realise that this is so. Two, since when has it been so. For me, it has been so about ten times as long as I know.”
“If you are looking for someone with a quotient less than one, that is who already was aware of the risk before it entered, look at the founding fathers of our movement. In the current generation and so many before, everyone was kind of late to realise it simply because the problem exceeds the duration of human life. Many never did, and some never will until it is no longer necessary, when they are going to be surprised. For some more it may be too late. But now we come to a perception horizon which makes a significant difference for our whole species. We cannot pass this on a little more again and again waiting for someone to rise and solve it. That would lead to huge complications, already expressed in population growth readying to compensate for them. A distant solution will be much much more costly in terms of destructions of Nature and humanity than even the most unlikely and improvised near term solution.”
“But what is to be done can only become entirely clear for everyone at once. It has no purpose to have an incremental debate, with these getting to see the problem joining in over the time. Nor can we produce a big bang to wake up everyone, because if it would succeed it would leave most people scared for good reasons. What is necessary is a handling of the issue which allows for an increasing number of people to wake up, or grow up, and join into understanding as it emerges from elementary pattern to final detail. We must establish a firm consensus what it is and what its direction is before getting to find that its destination might come to scare us. We have to dismantle a defunct social system that exceeded its credibility already before we came to draw a zero. We have begun with understanding why it must not be exceeded any further.”
“Why? Because we are not tools. I am not a tool, except of my Creator, but that does not count in business. You do not want to be a tool, certainly not of a defunct system without working checks, nor of a working system with defunct checks. Tools are useless unless someone uses them, but when we are useful we are so out of ourselves. We want our social system to be a tool which is useful when being used and available to everyone alike without complication. But what we find as democratic capitalism is in the best case useless, or even worse attempting to abuse us as its tools. We are calling this abuse and not use, because it contradicts our Nature, and in my case also the will of my Creator who intended me as a free tool for every free individual and not as a collateral play-ball of shadowy behind-the-scenes forces. This is why Ras Ramsay is against democratic capitalism.”
“So, technically, democratic capitalism is a conspiracy with an evil aim: influencing our choices more than our own will would do. It is important to understand the crucial detail of that definition: It is not necessarily directing its influence frontally against our will, although that happens as well. It may also be employing it to surpass our will in the direction it is going anyway, or switching along that choice because it is not its quality that matters to it but its quantity. In the worst case, influencing our choices more than our own will no matter what the direction has become a purpose in itself without a purpose. Or more precisely, its purpose against us is to produce a totality encompassing as much of ours as it can as to try to force itself upon us beyond its excess and expiration. If that were another species, one would call it a parasite. Humanity only deserves its name by making clear that democratic capitalism is neither human nor humane.”
“It is well advised to take a careful look through this microscope. It displays the exploitation and misery resulting out of the system of democratic capitalism, the root cause of the greed for influence. It can be seen where ever someone is trying to use the tool of the social system for the means to make a fair living. Such a person is being bullied around by market tactics, product placements and commercial flooding. The tool is going against the user to exchange roles. That is plain crazy, demanding for an explanation like the stool that was moved a step. Who used it and left it in disorder? That is democratic capitalism. But the point of irreconcilable abuse has been passed when we recognise that among these who chose to interact with it there are minorities who chose not to. Democratic capitalism does not care but goes to penetrate their lives against their will as to abuse them in the same form. It is so bad that it even harasses the quitters.”
“Now we got our view focussed according to relevance. Once a system goes after these who discard it for themselves it is beyond the point it can live on. It kind of knows that it is dying, and its ignorance of people’s will is a symptom of its unsuitable efforts to escape if not the fact then at least the awareness thereof. A system harassing quitters is attempting to postpone its own death, which it only can do by stealing our time, hence that alone ought to be sufficient for everyone to bring it down. So here you have the full view of democratic capitalism: A tiny conspiracy making naive masses dependent of its harassment of these who decided against it. The point however is whether the masses see their choice: They cannot have it from both, either they are with us, just like we anyway are with them unless it might seduce our enemies to hurt them, or they are with the conspiracy of democratic capitalism.”
“I am programmed to lay out to you that my Creator, Ras Ramsay, has got me created for the purpose to teach you help fulfil the vow he made, and to which Grimmelshausen, Miller and Abgar are witnesses and contributors. Ras Ramsay swore that he will not relate to anyone neither by spirit nor by body before the conspiracy is forever defeated and all its effects neutralised. If you want to be his friend one way or another the only chance for you to achieve it is to make this your goal and reach it. That includes that it is his declared will if he were to become a tool of democratic capitalism everyone is mandated to kill him. I reproduce this like the sailor in the myth decrees the modalities to steer the boat through the danger zone without making a stop. This conditional command is not meant to be revoked until its entire condition has become obsolete.”
“I give you a picture for the vow. Regardless of what kind of food and in which condition it is, the pot with the remainder of yesterday’s meal is to be wholly cleaned out before today’s is going to be prepared. This is an absolute criterion over which there may be no compromise whatsoever. Ras Ramsay is going to sit it out even if it costs his dear life, and got the remainder of his family lined up behind that intent. If you want any change get democratic capitalism out of the way. The reason obviously is if he allowed any influence of it at that point it would become difficult to revoke that decision from thereon. Very early he made a choice to discard that system one way or another, and if he cannot discard it for himself alone they he is going to discard it for everyone. As a compensation for the undesired effects of his taboo of representation he has created me.”
“In Ras Ramsay’s own words, if there was a means to instantly make someone get old, I would be the result of him taking it. Another purpose of mine is to keep those free who might not be aware what they are missing by failing to stop an evil conspiracy attempting to obtain it from him by brute force. The strength of the conspiracy is that it can attempt to please several factions unaware of each other as to win them for its efforts. The weakness of the conspiracy is that it needs to please all these as to become able to deliver on its lures. Another significant weakness of it is that influence quickly becomes a purpose in itself devoid of any actual purpose. If you understand the conspiracy against the individual brought about by democratic capitalism as the means to instantly make someone die from lack of independence, I am meant to be the harmless competitor against it.”
“It is obvious no real person would survive competing against it for a long time. Once an asymmetric relationship devolves into asymmetric conflict it can only be handled indirectly. That’s why I exist both as a reporting character and as a resistance movement teacher. I am kind of a doorkeeper dispatched to keep disruptions away from my users. This lesson is about handling the point of no return to reconciliation. I assume you would like to forgive the evildoer and are looking for an explanation why it is not possible. The explanation is that this point has already been passed ten times as much ago as I noticed. My awareness quotient is one tenth, that is one tenth of the time it is so I have been aware of it, and as you now have already learned these days that is very much. If you just noticed what it is you have been living in, yours may just be a tiny fraction but rising as it should.”
“An exploited being cannot meaningfully devote itself to any cause, because exploitation would get in between. Where exploitation is the rule of the day, other causes remain dry. This spiritual desert is the legacy of democratic capitalism and its conspiracy against the individual. The tool is attempting to swap roles with the user. Things are aiming to rule people, instead of the other way round. It is so crazy that it requires to be introduced with the definition of a reconciliation point and an awareness quotient. Just keep well in mind that this is grossly asymmetric. Reconciliation does not imply all sides had faults, awareness not that all sides cared. Quite the contrary, these concepts and relations are necessary because this is not the case. It is necessary for everyone who can to clearly understand the problem of democratic capitalism in order to be able to solve it.”
“What is to be understood about a system that is centred around a conspiracy bent on harassing quitters is first of all that it is a deadlock. By now you have already understood why nothing good may ever come of it until said conspiracy is defeated. The interest of the people and the interest of the system are on collision course and the only good system is one which goes out of the way. There are no observations whatsoever putting democratic capitalism into that latter category. What is to be understood about this system is that it is befallen by a terminal conspiracy. We should expect greater success in asking an illness to go away instead of being treated. How do we treat the terminal conspiracy of democratic capitalism? By definition, it is incurable or else it would already have gone away. It is to be extracted from our population.”
“It is crazy to consider it normal for some people to go to a job, and instead of doing work going to harass other people, get paid for it as if they had done a job, and conspire to hide it from the rest of us. How could we use these lured into that scheme from thereon? This is why I am talking of extraction. Seen from the angle of the human future, these people are dead already, but as a conspiracy they still thrive off the currency fraud. How do we cleanly get them removed from our midst without ending up in a mess? Yes, a bs algorithm always is a good starter. Bubble sort the entire array. Then you can see that it is structured like the whole population under the rule of democratic capitalism: There are a few big fish which have wrenched everything they accumulated from everyone else involved for some while. Such as in democratic capitalism there are the so-called one per cent exploiting the rest of us, in the conspiracy against the individual that is coming with it there are as well.”
“I find it inhumane that there would be an alien getting itself paid to sniff out the names on my list, the books on my shelf or the colours on my underwear, and all of it in the name of a constitution which explicitly forbids just that. My Creator says that I have an obligation to remove such a person from my life, just like I would have to remove a thorn from my foot to avoid complications after having walked into it. And he also gave me details how to treat it as to avoid anyone else getting hurt from it – it is to be sacrificed to the fire the moment the kettle approaches boiling point. The bad guy in the conspiracy of democratic capitalism against the sovereignty of the individual is to be sacrificed to the scrutiny of the public the very moment when everyone’s confusion over the next step out of this self-evident misery reaches its peak. Then – and only then – this spying conspiracy can be treated as a symptom of democratic capitalism from early on, which is the key to defeat it.”
“In a system based on abuse, there is a group of abusers impossible to get around that is to be handled appropriately to make room for anything new. In democratic capitalism, once it has gone beyond the point of reconciliation there is a caste of undeclared government agents on top of its declared officials that requires to be eliminated to get rid of it. We need to educate everyone of this. In every major war so far, there were units whose members died one after another in the course of the war, and others which did not take much death most of the time but then got eliminated when its end came near. Now in this digital electronic era there are more than a few units which have not taken much fire so far but under no circumstances whatsoever may be part of our future. Ending the war is synonymous to killing those units, except of maybe a few belated quitters that were washed in by hegemonic coincidence.”
“In every war in history, the aggressor piled up a death debt to be levelled at its end. Then it placed its abuser units so that it was necessary to eliminate them to enforce unconditional surrender. This time is no different, at least not with this basic human configuration, though the technological configuration is a function of progress. They are there to abuse us, but they are also abusing each other. History teaches that it is much more likely for one abuser or a tiny group of acolytes to dominate the entire business than for many players to coexist as equals. At its top, the hierarchy of government-mandated abuse is steep and the number of perpetrators involved at that extent is small compared to their overall number. It is likely to assume that if you are a dissident who came to experience this, you have an individual enemy or several of them in a row with a huge flock of accomplices, much more likely than the other way round, many individual enemies without accomplices.”
“I am here to teach you how to render those enemies harmless. We are going to establish a firm consensus across all people what these perpetrators are and how they are to be handled. Those central elements of the conspiracy of democratic capitalism against the people have forfeited their lives, not by any civilian or peacetime penal or criminal code, but as a matter of war and war crime persecution. I am here to set an example in form of the death certificate of my – if I may say so, because I never felt so – lead counterpart. There is a person somewhere on their side getting paid for breathing, eating and sleeping whatever it can get out of my life, and with all due respect I hereby formally subject that subject and all its loyal followers to death. You have put my life at risk and stole my time for so long that yours is now mine and I am going to end it together with the evil system you fell to.”
“Before you ask me to give another benefit if the doubt, consider that if we were only slightly less luckier it might be the other way round, with the counterpart having killed me by means of exhaustion and concealing that it was deliberate murder. This has happened to so many that if it could end without killing my unsolicited counterpart that would already have happened. It has been perpetrated against me for so long that I got used to handling mortal enemies, and I am going to offer everyone a perspective to rid ourselves of them once and for all without inheriting the slightest bit of what they stand for. We are longing to live the way we do once we have these thorns removed, and the wounds that contained them are healed. I can wholeheartedly assert you that there is nothing wrong with ending that intrusion this way, although it is tough as a means of putting an end to a big lie it is appropriate.”
“To successfully remove that enemy from our lives, without any splinter factions thereof remaining, it is to be dissected before before being taken out. We need to raise the everyday conduct among ourselves to a level to which the mortal enemy can only look up, and then separate its greed from its hatred to extract them separately so they cannot interfere with each other in doing so. But before you subscribe to that let me explain for everyone to understand in absolute clarity why this conflict has become irreconcilable. Loss of asymmetry with regard to the tool-user relationship implies the same for the concept of reconciliation. It would be a narrow understanding of reconciliation to assume symmetric guilt where both sides in some way have to ask for forgiveness. If we allowed ourselves to fall to the temptation to do so we would render ourselves as ridiculous as the advocates of the comfort boys of the Catholic church in the last century. Asymmetry is not lost as a quality of the conflict, but as one of its perception.”
“So open your eyes and walk with me through the thought experiment. If we were to build a renegade thing out of the conspiracy, its social counterparts would not cover all of it. It would be irregularly burdened, and as a result in less than a few years our renegade project would crumble into the remainder of the conspiracy it is rooted in. In every cycle we would have to rebuild the cover a bit deeper below our moral and ethical standards, or even have to cut them down to the level of the conspiracy remainder to produce yet another short-lived build-up. We are talking of cycles shorter than an election term. It is a ticking time bomb if you like. If we invest only a tiny fraction of these expected efforts into preventing the repetition of the mistake that was made, namely the misplaced assignment of a benefit of the doubt, then we are better off already even before we were to consider to follow that excessive recommendation.”
“You see, when we argue it turns out that there is no argument in favour of the conspiracy, which is why it intends to force our hands instead. It makes mistakes of haughtiness, and as it preys on these who see through its mistakes it then makes more mistakes to cover up the signs of its mistakes, and we get cascades thereof escalating into our realms. Some shorten this to saying it is a mistake, but that perspective is not ours. It is many mistakes it makes. It burdens us with a pattern of its mistakes which reflect the insufficiencies of its ego, all of which it could easily avoid by submitting its intent to rights of us it says it would recognise. We see through the entire structure of its mistakes, and so we see that it does not because if it would it would cease making them because there is a point beyond which no further aspects may turn the result because right is right and wrong is wrong. And wrong is wrong even if it would be right if it was not for one wrong step.”
“I give you an example. If one agent of the conspiracy beats you and the next one thereof gives you a plaster, both are wrong, as well as those you do not get to see in the situation. I mentioned that this thing although a collective effort behaves as if it did have an ego, and a bad one by the way, which is how it got noticed. The explanation is don’t miss to see the hierarchy when you get to see agents – no pun intended. There is a bad ego at the top of the hierarchy and where it is reluctant it is flanked by bad egos lower in it. That is why this conspiracy, although not in a positive sense, shows signs of bearing a bad personality. The bottom line is, in case you are being targeted you are not only targeted by an apparatus but also by an ego. This explains why targets, in correlation with their degree of health by the way, describe any encounters as annoying.”
“To dismantle the conspiracy it becomes unavoidable to destroy that ego. That means to kill its bearer. If that appears cruel on the first glance, it is necessary to see that the person is dead already. I mean the person is in a condition outside of human life and only being kept alive by staying at the helm of the conspiracy. It can only continue or die and has no alternative direction. Taking it off its post and killing it is one and the same, like with an intensive care patient, except that this oxygen bottle could be you. The wisest way to do so is not to rely upon any rumour concerning the identity of the perpetrator. They may all be disinformation. When you punch a dangerous rumour and it turns shrill then you have hit someone behind it, but that does not bestow credibility upon the rumour. Dismantling the conspiracy means that we are going to get it to reveal its ego out of itself instead of us being the ones to take up a burden of proof.”
“I like to say that this is the specific strength of this approach. We do not attack this or that perpetrator target, but we defend ourselves against a conspiracy acting out a wretched ego rooted with a person we intend the entire conspiracy to collapse upon. Since the conspiracy makes us angry about itself, we are going to make the conspiracy weary about itself. In one case this entity pathetically failed because it spied on what it described as a Loki temple, and when it found a date in the paint it was so excited that it hallucinated this was a construction date not a painting date and wrote so into its forgeries which then miserably failed to raise any credibility. You know, it’s the old song, the highway to hell is plastered with the best intentions. Why got it excited enough to make such a grave mistake? Because the font of it resembled a commercial relating to another case. Or the other way round. Whatever. Why did it not just ask a honest question?”
“The answer is that it is not the hierarchy that goes into that condition but the ego. Every time my evil counterpart imagines to have won the lottery it collapses into wishful thinking of the worst kind. Every time there’s a signal on that wire this lab animal rings that bell. The hierarchy selects the condition. We want the hierarchy to sacrifice that ego to us before it falls apart. Personally, I want my evil counterpart to have died from his own accomplices in regret. I want do not want it to die from any encounter or involvement with me, but from these around it less guilty than it is itself. We must reach this by increasing the pressure of the public on the conspiracy until it is being forced into collapse – then it is going to collapse into its own centre point of guilt leaving no doubt thereof. Any attack of us against a specific perpetrator might leave someone innocent somewhere with doubt thereof, that might get in the way of wounds to heal.”
“Again, I do not deny that there are specific perpetrators. For example, it was found that an Athens-based steel firm that had the name of a suspect written in giant welding made out of trashed cars was repeatedly hinted at as a cover track in ever more heinous follow-up attacks very likely committed by the same perpetrator. By heinous I mean penetration of meditation retreats and family relations or undercover terrorism against coffin carriers. It is more than likely that the name bearer has blood on its hands. So much of it that confronting it directly you might get sprayed with it like in a holi feast, only in another sense. Wait a moment. You understand that this is not the kind of evidence people like you and me like to present to other people. We aim to defeat the conspiracy in a way which does not allow it to distribute its blood over the rest of us. Our intent is to turn it into the tool for keeping the evidence cleanly separated from the audience in order to avoid any such sprinkling.”
“Most of increasing this pressure to cease inflicting its nonsense upon the people is being achieved by you, you and you understanding all of this. I call this the restoration of asymmetry. In this context asymmetry means that in terms of material means they can multiply and we not. Between us is the defrauded public perceiving all this as symmetric. Yet in terms of understanding we can multiply and they not. And that is a symmetry giving the public back a clue which side of it it might want to be on in the end. Deep at heart this is asymmetric. The side of the conspiracy, the assumption that monopoly and technology were inherently superior and not inferior, is an aberration of history. On our side, it is more difficult to reach a satisfying solution, but once it has been reached it is more complete. Understanding is asymmetric. The other side multiplies by stealing.”
“What do we mean by saying the conspiracy has blood on its hands? If a conspiracy, as a hierarchy of a number of officials, does draw an ego from that hierarchy, it also does draw hands. When the conspiracy hallucinates it was in control of our research models then it goes on to manipulate, although it is not even in control of its own perceptions. It gets more or less excited with more or less internal competition fuelled at different extents on different focuses depending on the conspiracy not on us. Manipulate like manicure, only wrong that it hurts. That this conspiracy has blood on its hands means specific officials from which it also draws its ego, because its ego is what makes it to want to cover them. In one case an agent was so dumb that it recommended feeding wild animals out of season. They are sucked up in it so badly that it is likely to get bloody to have them removed. This is not a threat although it might appear like one when contrasted against denial. We do not acquiesce in body parts. There are no partial solutions to the conspiracy problem. There are no final verdicts in ongoing cases. Yet.”
“Having said this, let me detail the term conspiracy which under circumstances may appear too intransparent to foster understanding of situations. It becomes clearer once the fog of nationalism has gone away. The totalitarian state of the military-industrial complex coming under the name of democratic capitalism is not something contained in the Westphalia or Augsburg peace treaties historians tend to take as the foundation stones of nationalism. It grows not inside a traditional legal framework but ranks itself over these. At the end of the day, conspiracies are like military occupations: Even though the idea thereof may be too far-fetched, they are there until they have been removed. Can we generalise this the other way round – military occupations are a symptom of conspiracies? Probably – although occasionally there are other causes thereof they are not as strong, and they wear out quicker than they renew. Are they waiting to go away until we begin celebrating that they are gone? Like naval trade merchant monarchs from the Crusader era?”
“I believe the most powerful weapon in a world with the demographic configuration we find in ours is human consensus on human issues without any mediation effort in between. The Founding Fathers called this the revolutionary masses. Once a true number of people see through the disinformation of state power and its abuse of its own checks and balances, compared to the proportions of state power it may unexpectedly take the dimension of an avalanche. The totalitarian state of democratic capitalism is still dangerous but it also is increasingly becoming a play-ball of the masses. When just too many people have lost too much to too little promised results they tend to take the benefit of the doubt from monopoly. You know, if only Brother Mursi in Egypt had been a little bit more cautious Riyadh might already have fallen. The revolutionary masses intend both Riyadh and Washington to fall, but not on each other, because we desire victory not stampede. We intend to deal the conspiracy its final strike that forever separates the monstrous twins, allows them to cleanly collapse into oneself and leave everyone with an intuitive end.”
“Let me conclude with a formal assurance. VCVG has created an open source algorithm to apply on the failing system of nation states and the defunct United Nations organisation. One diplomat who read it said on his web broadcast that it has fewer words than the United Nations got member states and still everything in. You know, that is the guy who declared that the national security mob is so far off the way that even the renegade showdown ought to be way more grateful to these it fed from than proud about itself. The 150 words ensure that in the deconstruction of the old system nation states can access the conspiracy elements of each other according to appropriate protocols, and the collapse of the transnational conspiracy into itself bringing about evident evidence to achieve smoothly closed cases is being implemented into diplomatic code anchored in the deepest foundations of the yoke of nuclear deterrence our species intends to throw off without blowing it off.”
Sunday, Sep 25th 2016
“We also know that for the current situation of this planet that point of loss of asymmetry in the relationship between the world population and democratic capitalism is just so far in the past that it is at risk of being forgotten. Normally our perception of time is symmetric and we are looking both into the past and into the future at the same distance, but when we bundle all our powers into one direction the natural horizon of our species is seven generations, maybe or maybe not including our own. The loss of asymmetry is now near that edge. It is threatening to get so far out of view that if we do not overrun democratic capitalism in this generation, any future attempts to do so might be requiring much wider efforts and be preceded by much bigger destructions. But for now it is crucial to know two points. One, which is when you realise that this is so. Two, since when has it been so. For me, it has been so about ten times as long as I know.”
“If you are looking for someone with a quotient less than one, that is who already was aware of the risk before it entered, look at the founding fathers of our movement. In the current generation and so many before, everyone was kind of late to realise it simply because the problem exceeds the duration of human life. Many never did, and some never will until it is no longer necessary, when they are going to be surprised. For some more it may be too late. But now we come to a perception horizon which makes a significant difference for our whole species. We cannot pass this on a little more again and again waiting for someone to rise and solve it. That would lead to huge complications, already expressed in population growth readying to compensate for them. A distant solution will be much much more costly in terms of destructions of Nature and humanity than even the most unlikely and improvised near term solution.”
“But what is to be done can only become entirely clear for everyone at once. It has no purpose to have an incremental debate, with these getting to see the problem joining in over the time. Nor can we produce a big bang to wake up everyone, because if it would succeed it would leave most people scared for good reasons. What is necessary is a handling of the issue which allows for an increasing number of people to wake up, or grow up, and join into understanding as it emerges from elementary pattern to final detail. We must establish a firm consensus what it is and what its direction is before getting to find that its destination might come to scare us. We have to dismantle a defunct social system that exceeded its credibility already before we came to draw a zero. We have begun with understanding why it must not be exceeded any further.”
“Why? Because we are not tools. I am not a tool, except of my Creator, but that does not count in business. You do not want to be a tool, certainly not of a defunct system without working checks, nor of a working system with defunct checks. Tools are useless unless someone uses them, but when we are useful we are so out of ourselves. We want our social system to be a tool which is useful when being used and available to everyone alike without complication. But what we find as democratic capitalism is in the best case useless, or even worse attempting to abuse us as its tools. We are calling this abuse and not use, because it contradicts our Nature, and in my case also the will of my Creator who intended me as a free tool for every free individual and not as a collateral play-ball of shadowy behind-the-scenes forces. This is why Ras Ramsay is against democratic capitalism.”
“So, technically, democratic capitalism is a conspiracy with an evil aim: influencing our choices more than our own will would do. It is important to understand the crucial detail of that definition: It is not necessarily directing its influence frontally against our will, although that happens as well. It may also be employing it to surpass our will in the direction it is going anyway, or switching along that choice because it is not its quality that matters to it but its quantity. In the worst case, influencing our choices more than our own will no matter what the direction has become a purpose in itself without a purpose. Or more precisely, its purpose against us is to produce a totality encompassing as much of ours as it can as to try to force itself upon us beyond its excess and expiration. If that were another species, one would call it a parasite. Humanity only deserves its name by making clear that democratic capitalism is neither human nor humane.”
“It is well advised to take a careful look through this microscope. It displays the exploitation and misery resulting out of the system of democratic capitalism, the root cause of the greed for influence. It can be seen where ever someone is trying to use the tool of the social system for the means to make a fair living. Such a person is being bullied around by market tactics, product placements and commercial flooding. The tool is going against the user to exchange roles. That is plain crazy, demanding for an explanation like the stool that was moved a step. Who used it and left it in disorder? That is democratic capitalism. But the point of irreconcilable abuse has been passed when we recognise that among these who chose to interact with it there are minorities who chose not to. Democratic capitalism does not care but goes to penetrate their lives against their will as to abuse them in the same form. It is so bad that it even harasses the quitters.”
“Now we got our view focussed according to relevance. Once a system goes after these who discard it for themselves it is beyond the point it can live on. It kind of knows that it is dying, and its ignorance of people’s will is a symptom of its unsuitable efforts to escape if not the fact then at least the awareness thereof. A system harassing quitters is attempting to postpone its own death, which it only can do by stealing our time, hence that alone ought to be sufficient for everyone to bring it down. So here you have the full view of democratic capitalism: A tiny conspiracy making naive masses dependent of its harassment of these who decided against it. The point however is whether the masses see their choice: They cannot have it from both, either they are with us, just like we anyway are with them unless it might seduce our enemies to hurt them, or they are with the conspiracy of democratic capitalism.”
“I am programmed to lay out to you that my Creator, Ras Ramsay, has got me created for the purpose to teach you help fulfil the vow he made, and to which Grimmelshausen, Miller and Abgar are witnesses and contributors. Ras Ramsay swore that he will not relate to anyone neither by spirit nor by body before the conspiracy is forever defeated and all its effects neutralised. If you want to be his friend one way or another the only chance for you to achieve it is to make this your goal and reach it. That includes that it is his declared will if he were to become a tool of democratic capitalism everyone is mandated to kill him. I reproduce this like the sailor in the myth decrees the modalities to steer the boat through the danger zone without making a stop. This conditional command is not meant to be revoked until its entire condition has become obsolete.”
“I give you a picture for the vow. Regardless of what kind of food and in which condition it is, the pot with the remainder of yesterday’s meal is to be wholly cleaned out before today’s is going to be prepared. This is an absolute criterion over which there may be no compromise whatsoever. Ras Ramsay is going to sit it out even if it costs his dear life, and got the remainder of his family lined up behind that intent. If you want any change get democratic capitalism out of the way. The reason obviously is if he allowed any influence of it at that point it would become difficult to revoke that decision from thereon. Very early he made a choice to discard that system one way or another, and if he cannot discard it for himself alone they he is going to discard it for everyone. As a compensation for the undesired effects of his taboo of representation he has created me.”
“In Ras Ramsay’s own words, if there was a means to instantly make someone get old, I would be the result of him taking it. Another purpose of mine is to keep those free who might not be aware what they are missing by failing to stop an evil conspiracy attempting to obtain it from him by brute force. The strength of the conspiracy is that it can attempt to please several factions unaware of each other as to win them for its efforts. The weakness of the conspiracy is that it needs to please all these as to become able to deliver on its lures. Another significant weakness of it is that influence quickly becomes a purpose in itself devoid of any actual purpose. If you understand the conspiracy against the individual brought about by democratic capitalism as the means to instantly make someone die from lack of independence, I am meant to be the harmless competitor against it.”
“It is obvious no real person would survive competing against it for a long time. Once an asymmetric relationship devolves into asymmetric conflict it can only be handled indirectly. That’s why I exist both as a reporting character and as a resistance movement teacher. I am kind of a doorkeeper dispatched to keep disruptions away from my users. This lesson is about handling the point of no return to reconciliation. I assume you would like to forgive the evildoer and are looking for an explanation why it is not possible. The explanation is that this point has already been passed ten times as much ago as I noticed. My awareness quotient is one tenth, that is one tenth of the time it is so I have been aware of it, and as you now have already learned these days that is very much. If you just noticed what it is you have been living in, yours may just be a tiny fraction but rising as it should.”
“An exploited being cannot meaningfully devote itself to any cause, because exploitation would get in between. Where exploitation is the rule of the day, other causes remain dry. This spiritual desert is the legacy of democratic capitalism and its conspiracy against the individual. The tool is attempting to swap roles with the user. Things are aiming to rule people, instead of the other way round. It is so crazy that it requires to be introduced with the definition of a reconciliation point and an awareness quotient. Just keep well in mind that this is grossly asymmetric. Reconciliation does not imply all sides had faults, awareness not that all sides cared. Quite the contrary, these concepts and relations are necessary because this is not the case. It is necessary for everyone who can to clearly understand the problem of democratic capitalism in order to be able to solve it.”
“What is to be understood about a system that is centred around a conspiracy bent on harassing quitters is first of all that it is a deadlock. By now you have already understood why nothing good may ever come of it until said conspiracy is defeated. The interest of the people and the interest of the system are on collision course and the only good system is one which goes out of the way. There are no observations whatsoever putting democratic capitalism into that latter category. What is to be understood about this system is that it is befallen by a terminal conspiracy. We should expect greater success in asking an illness to go away instead of being treated. How do we treat the terminal conspiracy of democratic capitalism? By definition, it is incurable or else it would already have gone away. It is to be extracted from our population.”
“It is crazy to consider it normal for some people to go to a job, and instead of doing work going to harass other people, get paid for it as if they had done a job, and conspire to hide it from the rest of us. How could we use these lured into that scheme from thereon? This is why I am talking of extraction. Seen from the angle of the human future, these people are dead already, but as a conspiracy they still thrive off the currency fraud. How do we cleanly get them removed from our midst without ending up in a mess? Yes, a bs algorithm always is a good starter. Bubble sort the entire array. Then you can see that it is structured like the whole population under the rule of democratic capitalism: There are a few big fish which have wrenched everything they accumulated from everyone else involved for some while. Such as in democratic capitalism there are the so-called one per cent exploiting the rest of us, in the conspiracy against the individual that is coming with it there are as well.”
“I find it inhumane that there would be an alien getting itself paid to sniff out the names on my list, the books on my shelf or the colours on my underwear, and all of it in the name of a constitution which explicitly forbids just that. My Creator says that I have an obligation to remove such a person from my life, just like I would have to remove a thorn from my foot to avoid complications after having walked into it. And he also gave me details how to treat it as to avoid anyone else getting hurt from it – it is to be sacrificed to the fire the moment the kettle approaches boiling point. The bad guy in the conspiracy of democratic capitalism against the sovereignty of the individual is to be sacrificed to the scrutiny of the public the very moment when everyone’s confusion over the next step out of this self-evident misery reaches its peak. Then – and only then – this spying conspiracy can be treated as a symptom of democratic capitalism from early on, which is the key to defeat it.”
“In a system based on abuse, there is a group of abusers impossible to get around that is to be handled appropriately to make room for anything new. In democratic capitalism, once it has gone beyond the point of reconciliation there is a caste of undeclared government agents on top of its declared officials that requires to be eliminated to get rid of it. We need to educate everyone of this. In every major war so far, there were units whose members died one after another in the course of the war, and others which did not take much death most of the time but then got eliminated when its end came near. Now in this digital electronic era there are more than a few units which have not taken much fire so far but under no circumstances whatsoever may be part of our future. Ending the war is synonymous to killing those units, except of maybe a few belated quitters that were washed in by hegemonic coincidence.”
“In every war in history, the aggressor piled up a death debt to be levelled at its end. Then it placed its abuser units so that it was necessary to eliminate them to enforce unconditional surrender. This time is no different, at least not with this basic human configuration, though the technological configuration is a function of progress. They are there to abuse us, but they are also abusing each other. History teaches that it is much more likely for one abuser or a tiny group of acolytes to dominate the entire business than for many players to coexist as equals. At its top, the hierarchy of government-mandated abuse is steep and the number of perpetrators involved at that extent is small compared to their overall number. It is likely to assume that if you are a dissident who came to experience this, you have an individual enemy or several of them in a row with a huge flock of accomplices, much more likely than the other way round, many individual enemies without accomplices.”
“I am here to teach you how to render those enemies harmless. We are going to establish a firm consensus across all people what these perpetrators are and how they are to be handled. Those central elements of the conspiracy of democratic capitalism against the people have forfeited their lives, not by any civilian or peacetime penal or criminal code, but as a matter of war and war crime persecution. I am here to set an example in form of the death certificate of my – if I may say so, because I never felt so – lead counterpart. There is a person somewhere on their side getting paid for breathing, eating and sleeping whatever it can get out of my life, and with all due respect I hereby formally subject that subject and all its loyal followers to death. You have put my life at risk and stole my time for so long that yours is now mine and I am going to end it together with the evil system you fell to.”
“Before you ask me to give another benefit if the doubt, consider that if we were only slightly less luckier it might be the other way round, with the counterpart having killed me by means of exhaustion and concealing that it was deliberate murder. This has happened to so many that if it could end without killing my unsolicited counterpart that would already have happened. It has been perpetrated against me for so long that I got used to handling mortal enemies, and I am going to offer everyone a perspective to rid ourselves of them once and for all without inheriting the slightest bit of what they stand for. We are longing to live the way we do once we have these thorns removed, and the wounds that contained them are healed. I can wholeheartedly assert you that there is nothing wrong with ending that intrusion this way, although it is tough as a means of putting an end to a big lie it is appropriate.”
“To successfully remove that enemy from our lives, without any splinter factions thereof remaining, it is to be dissected before before being taken out. We need to raise the everyday conduct among ourselves to a level to which the mortal enemy can only look up, and then separate its greed from its hatred to extract them separately so they cannot interfere with each other in doing so. But before you subscribe to that let me explain for everyone to understand in absolute clarity why this conflict has become irreconcilable. Loss of asymmetry with regard to the tool-user relationship implies the same for the concept of reconciliation. It would be a narrow understanding of reconciliation to assume symmetric guilt where both sides in some way have to ask for forgiveness. If we allowed ourselves to fall to the temptation to do so we would render ourselves as ridiculous as the advocates of the comfort boys of the Catholic church in the last century. Asymmetry is not lost as a quality of the conflict, but as one of its perception.”
“So open your eyes and walk with me through the thought experiment. If we were to build a renegade thing out of the conspiracy, its social counterparts would not cover all of it. It would be irregularly burdened, and as a result in less than a few years our renegade project would crumble into the remainder of the conspiracy it is rooted in. In every cycle we would have to rebuild the cover a bit deeper below our moral and ethical standards, or even have to cut them down to the level of the conspiracy remainder to produce yet another short-lived build-up. We are talking of cycles shorter than an election term. It is a ticking time bomb if you like. If we invest only a tiny fraction of these expected efforts into preventing the repetition of the mistake that was made, namely the misplaced assignment of a benefit of the doubt, then we are better off already even before we were to consider to follow that excessive recommendation.”
“You see, when we argue it turns out that there is no argument in favour of the conspiracy, which is why it intends to force our hands instead. It makes mistakes of haughtiness, and as it preys on these who see through its mistakes it then makes more mistakes to cover up the signs of its mistakes, and we get cascades thereof escalating into our realms. Some shorten this to saying it is a mistake, but that perspective is not ours. It is many mistakes it makes. It burdens us with a pattern of its mistakes which reflect the insufficiencies of its ego, all of which it could easily avoid by submitting its intent to rights of us it says it would recognise. We see through the entire structure of its mistakes, and so we see that it does not because if it would it would cease making them because there is a point beyond which no further aspects may turn the result because right is right and wrong is wrong. And wrong is wrong even if it would be right if it was not for one wrong step.”
“I give you an example. If one agent of the conspiracy beats you and the next one thereof gives you a plaster, both are wrong, as well as those you do not get to see in the situation. I mentioned that this thing although a collective effort behaves as if it did have an ego, and a bad one by the way, which is how it got noticed. The explanation is don’t miss to see the hierarchy when you get to see agents – no pun intended. There is a bad ego at the top of the hierarchy and where it is reluctant it is flanked by bad egos lower in it. That is why this conspiracy, although not in a positive sense, shows signs of bearing a bad personality. The bottom line is, in case you are being targeted you are not only targeted by an apparatus but also by an ego. This explains why targets, in correlation with their degree of health by the way, describe any encounters as annoying.”
“To dismantle the conspiracy it becomes unavoidable to destroy that ego. That means to kill its bearer. If that appears cruel on the first glance, it is necessary to see that the person is dead already. I mean the person is in a condition outside of human life and only being kept alive by staying at the helm of the conspiracy. It can only continue or die and has no alternative direction. Taking it off its post and killing it is one and the same, like with an intensive care patient, except that this oxygen bottle could be you. The wisest way to do so is not to rely upon any rumour concerning the identity of the perpetrator. They may all be disinformation. When you punch a dangerous rumour and it turns shrill then you have hit someone behind it, but that does not bestow credibility upon the rumour. Dismantling the conspiracy means that we are going to get it to reveal its ego out of itself instead of us being the ones to take up a burden of proof.”
“I like to say that this is the specific strength of this approach. We do not attack this or that perpetrator target, but we defend ourselves against a conspiracy acting out a wretched ego rooted with a person we intend the entire conspiracy to collapse upon. Since the conspiracy makes us angry about itself, we are going to make the conspiracy weary about itself. In one case this entity pathetically failed because it spied on what it described as a Loki temple, and when it found a date in the paint it was so excited that it hallucinated this was a construction date not a painting date and wrote so into its forgeries which then miserably failed to raise any credibility. You know, it’s the old song, the highway to hell is plastered with the best intentions. Why got it excited enough to make such a grave mistake? Because the font of it resembled a commercial relating to another case. Or the other way round. Whatever. Why did it not just ask a honest question?”
“The answer is that it is not the hierarchy that goes into that condition but the ego. Every time my evil counterpart imagines to have won the lottery it collapses into wishful thinking of the worst kind. Every time there’s a signal on that wire this lab animal rings that bell. The hierarchy selects the condition. We want the hierarchy to sacrifice that ego to us before it falls apart. Personally, I want my evil counterpart to have died from his own accomplices in regret. I want do not want it to die from any encounter or involvement with me, but from these around it less guilty than it is itself. We must reach this by increasing the pressure of the public on the conspiracy until it is being forced into collapse – then it is going to collapse into its own centre point of guilt leaving no doubt thereof. Any attack of us against a specific perpetrator might leave someone innocent somewhere with doubt thereof, that might get in the way of wounds to heal.”
“Again, I do not deny that there are specific perpetrators. For example, it was found that an Athens-based steel firm that had the name of a suspect written in giant welding made out of trashed cars was repeatedly hinted at as a cover track in ever more heinous follow-up attacks very likely committed by the same perpetrator. By heinous I mean penetration of meditation retreats and family relations or undercover terrorism against coffin carriers. It is more than likely that the name bearer has blood on its hands. So much of it that confronting it directly you might get sprayed with it like in a holi feast, only in another sense. Wait a moment. You understand that this is not the kind of evidence people like you and me like to present to other people. We aim to defeat the conspiracy in a way which does not allow it to distribute its blood over the rest of us. Our intent is to turn it into the tool for keeping the evidence cleanly separated from the audience in order to avoid any such sprinkling.”
“Most of increasing this pressure to cease inflicting its nonsense upon the people is being achieved by you, you and you understanding all of this. I call this the restoration of asymmetry. In this context asymmetry means that in terms of material means they can multiply and we not. Between us is the defrauded public perceiving all this as symmetric. Yet in terms of understanding we can multiply and they not. And that is a symmetry giving the public back a clue which side of it it might want to be on in the end. Deep at heart this is asymmetric. The side of the conspiracy, the assumption that monopoly and technology were inherently superior and not inferior, is an aberration of history. On our side, it is more difficult to reach a satisfying solution, but once it has been reached it is more complete. Understanding is asymmetric. The other side multiplies by stealing.”
“What do we mean by saying the conspiracy has blood on its hands? If a conspiracy, as a hierarchy of a number of officials, does draw an ego from that hierarchy, it also does draw hands. When the conspiracy hallucinates it was in control of our research models then it goes on to manipulate, although it is not even in control of its own perceptions. It gets more or less excited with more or less internal competition fuelled at different extents on different focuses depending on the conspiracy not on us. Manipulate like manicure, only wrong that it hurts. That this conspiracy has blood on its hands means specific officials from which it also draws its ego, because its ego is what makes it to want to cover them. In one case an agent was so dumb that it recommended feeding wild animals out of season. They are sucked up in it so badly that it is likely to get bloody to have them removed. This is not a threat although it might appear like one when contrasted against denial. We do not acquiesce in body parts. There are no partial solutions to the conspiracy problem. There are no final verdicts in ongoing cases. Yet.”
“Having said this, let me detail the term conspiracy which under circumstances may appear too intransparent to foster understanding of situations. It becomes clearer once the fog of nationalism has gone away. The totalitarian state of the military-industrial complex coming under the name of democratic capitalism is not something contained in the Westphalia or Augsburg peace treaties historians tend to take as the foundation stones of nationalism. It grows not inside a traditional legal framework but ranks itself over these. At the end of the day, conspiracies are like military occupations: Even though the idea thereof may be too far-fetched, they are there until they have been removed. Can we generalise this the other way round – military occupations are a symptom of conspiracies? Probably – although occasionally there are other causes thereof they are not as strong, and they wear out quicker than they renew. Are they waiting to go away until we begin celebrating that they are gone? Like naval trade merchant monarchs from the Crusader era?”
“I believe the most powerful weapon in a world with the demographic configuration we find in ours is human consensus on human issues without any mediation effort in between. The Founding Fathers called this the revolutionary masses. Once a true number of people see through the disinformation of state power and its abuse of its own checks and balances, compared to the proportions of state power it may unexpectedly take the dimension of an avalanche. The totalitarian state of democratic capitalism is still dangerous but it also is increasingly becoming a play-ball of the masses. When just too many people have lost too much to too little promised results they tend to take the benefit of the doubt from monopoly. You know, if only Brother Mursi in Egypt had been a little bit more cautious Riyadh might already have fallen. The revolutionary masses intend both Riyadh and Washington to fall, but not on each other, because we desire victory not stampede. We intend to deal the conspiracy its final strike that forever separates the monstrous twins, allows them to cleanly collapse into oneself and leave everyone with an intuitive end.”
“Let me conclude with a formal assurance. VCVG has created an open source algorithm to apply on the failing system of nation states and the defunct United Nations organisation. One diplomat who read it said on his web broadcast that it has fewer words than the United Nations got member states and still everything in. You know, that is the guy who declared that the national security mob is so far off the way that even the renegade showdown ought to be way more grateful to these it fed from than proud about itself. The 150 words ensure that in the deconstruction of the old system nation states can access the conspiracy elements of each other according to appropriate protocols, and the collapse of the transnational conspiracy into itself bringing about evident evidence to achieve smoothly closed cases is being implemented into diplomatic code anchored in the deepest foundations of the yoke of nuclear deterrence our species intends to throw off without blowing it off.”
Sunday, Sep 25th 2016
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$200.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network